ArticlePopulation health metrics2025
Beyond binary: a machine-learning classification of childhood COVID-19 vaccination intentions using behavioural data.
Article in Population health metrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImmunisation is one of the most cost-effective tools for preventing infectious diseases. Yet, vaccine hesitancy, defined as a delayed acceptance or refusal of vaccination despite availability, has grown in recent years, threatening global public health efforts. This study investigates how socio-demographic and behavioural factors relate to willingness to vaccinate children against COVID-19, moving beyond binary pro-/anti-vaccine classifications to explore a more nuanced spectrum of intentions.
methodsUsing a large-scale survey conducted in summer 2021 among 5,552 adults (2,041 parents and 3,511 non-parents) in Italy and the UK, we applied supervised machine learning models (XGBoost, Random Forest, and Multinomial Logistic Regression) to identify population segments based on their willingness to vaccinate children against COVID-19. We emphasise the importance of intention-based segmentation by distinguishing between “unwilling”, “undecided,” and “willing” respondents, a classification that better reflects the continuum of vaccination intentions.
resultsOur findings, based on SHAP value analysis, show that friends’ opinion, the age of the child, and trust in vaccines are the strongest predictors of parental stances, with friends’ opinion emerging as the top factor across all models for parents. Overall, behavioural indicators played a key role in distinguishing between willingness groups.
conclusionsBy integrating survey data with interpretable machine learning, this study highlights the importance of behavioural profiling and data collection for tailoring public health messages and targeting interventions to the most responsive segments of the population. While our empirical analysis is situated in the context of childhood COVID-19 vaccination, the framework has broader relevance for understanding parental decision-making and designing communication strategies in future vaccination campaigns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.