Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41444878›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025

Why do you think you still have pain? Individuals' beliefs on the biopsychosocial factors that contribute to their chronic musculoskeletal pain: a qualitative exploration.

Michael Dunn, Alison B Rushton, Nicola R Heneghan, Andrew Soundy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael DunnUniversity of Birmingham, Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain, School of Sport and Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. mdunn@citystgeorges.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6559-663X
Alison B RushtonFaculty of Health Sciences, Western University, School of Physical Therapy, Richmond Street, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8114-7669
Nicola R HeneghanUniversity of Birmingham, Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain, School of Sport and Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7599-3674
Andrew SoundyUniversity of Birmingham, Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain, School of Sport and Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. a.a.soundy@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5118-5872

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is complex with many biopsychosocial factors that contribute to its development. Existing research has established individuals’ beliefs on the biological factors that contribute to CMP, but not psychosocial factors. The aim of this study was to determine individuals’ beliefs on the biopsychosocial factors that contribute to their CMP, with specific focus on beliefs about psychosocial contributors.

methodsA preliminary exploration using interpretative phenomenological analysis methods is reported according to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research. Adults with CMP were recruited from the general public. Four stages of data analysis were undertaken to identify superordinate and subthemes.

resultsIn-depth analysis of n = 6 participants’ interviews identified six superordinate themes. Participants with higher disability from their CMP described psychological factors including negative psychological experiences (distress, loss of self-identity, negative thoughts/emotions, and stress), dissatisfaction with healthcare (let down, fobbed off, lack of empathy, lack of trust), and maladaptive coping strategies (catastrophisation, avoidance, external locus of control), and did not believe these contributed to their CMP. Participants with lower disability from their CMP described positive psychological experiences (solution focussed coping, positive attitudes) and believed these contributed to their CMP by reducing its severity. Participants described social factors including historical activities (work, sport, exercise) and believed these contributed to CMP via the perceived impact of activity causing musculoskeletal structural degeneration or injury. Participants believed biological factors such as structural changes (injury, degeneration) were the main cause of the development and persistence of their CMP.

conclusionIndividuals with higher disability and negative psychological experiences did not believe these were contributory to their CMP, while those with lower disability and positive psychological experiences believed these do contribute to CMP by reducing its severity. Biological factors such as musculoskeletal structural changes were considered the main cause of CMP. Social factors were believed to contribute to CMP through the perceived impact of physical activity on structural changes. Beliefs are not in keeping with contemporary understandings of CMP which may limit engagement with interventions such as exercise or psychosocial therapies.

Indexed as

Chronic PainMusculoskeletal PainAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultCoping SkillsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchBeliefsChronic musculoskeletal painInterpretative phenomenological analysisQualitative

Identifiers

PMID41444878
PMCPMC12729344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.