Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41444875›Full record

Observational studyReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2025

The association between sedentary behavior and infertility: a population-based cross-sectional observational study and Mendelian randomization analysis.

Yun Wang, Hongchu Bao, Zhenteng Liu, Qinglan Qu, Dongmei Zhao, Shunzhi He

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yun WangDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China.
Hongchu BaoDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China.
Zhenteng LiuDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China.
Qinglan QuDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China.
Dongmei ZhaoDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China. 13605355283@163.com.
Shunzhi HeDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China. tophha@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe relationship between sedentary behavior and infertility remains ambiguous and contentious. This study seeks to elucidate this association by analyzing data from the 2013-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), coupled with Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses.

methodsOur analysis comprised 2904 female participants, aged 20 to 49 years, enrolled in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) during the 2013-2018 cycles. Weighted multivariate logistic regression model was employed to examine the association between sedentary behavior and infertility, with sensitivity analysis conducted to validate the robustness of the findings. In addition, we used restricted cubic spline (RCS) curves to explore any non-linear association between sedentary behavior and infertility. A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was subsequently conducted using summary-level data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to investigate the potential causal links between self-reported leisure screen time (LST), sedentary commuting, sedentary behavior at work, and infertility. Causal estimates were primarily obtained with the inverse-variance weighted (IVW), while the weighted median, MR-Egger, and weighted mode were applied as complementary analyses. To evaluate the robustness of these results, horizontal pleiotropy was assessed using the MR-Egger intercept, heterogeneity was examined with Cochran's Q test, and additional sensitivity testing was performed through leave-one-out analyses.

resultsAfter adjusting for potential confounders, the weighted multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that although the prevalence of infertility appeared to increase with longer daily sitting time, this association did not reach statistical significance (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00-1.07, P = 0.066). Results from multiple sensitivity analyses remained largely consistent, supporting the robustness of these findings. In the Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, no statistically significant causal relationship was observed between genetically predicted sedentary behavior and infertility. Specifically, the inverse variance-weighted (IVW) estimates suggested no robust evidence of causality between leisure screen time (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.10-1.24, P = 0.052), sedentary commuting (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.88-1.62, P = 0.257), or sedentary behavior at work (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.83-1.19, P = 0.930) and infertility.

conclusionNo statistically significant evidence was found to support an association between sedentary behavior and infertility. Future large-scale prospective studies are warranted to further explore this potential relationship.

Indexed as

Infertility, FemaleSedentary BehaviorAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMendelian Randomization AnalysisMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysYoung AdultDaily sitting timeInfertilityMendelian randomization analysisNational health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES)Sedentary behavior

Identifiers

PMID41444875
PMCPMC12729209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.