Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41444870›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2025

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Geriatric Feelings of Burdensomeness Scale (GFBS) and analysis of associated factors.

Chunyan Zhang, Huijuan Tong, Yanhong Liu, Chuanqi Wen, Kaiyan Xu, Mingyan Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chunyan ZhangAffiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, 250011, China.
Huijuan TongSchool of Nursing, Shenyang Medical College, No. 146, Huanghe North Street, Beiling Subdistrict, Yuhong District, Shenyang, 110034, China. thj_9921@163.com.
Yanhong LiuAffiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, 250011, China.
Chuanqi WenAffiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, 250011, China.
Kaiyan XuSchool of Nursing, Jinzhou Medical University, No. 40, Section 3, Songpo Road, Jinzhou, 121001, China.
Mingyan WangJinan Second People's Hospital, No. 148, Jingyi Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan, 250021, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the accelerating aging population in China, there is increasing attention to the quality of life and mental health issues among older adults. Elevated burden not only deteriorates psychological and physical health but also leads to social isolation and decreased quality of life. However, there is currently a lack of specific assessment tools for measuring burden among older adults in China. This study aims to translate the Geriatric Feelings of Burdensomeness Scale (GFBS) into Chinese, assess its validity and reliability within the general older adult population, and explore the factors influencing GFBS scores.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted involving 500 Chinese older adults. Using the Brislin translation technique, the original scale was translated into Chinese employing a forward-backward translation method. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were used to test the structural validity of the scale. In contrast, content validity was evaluated using the Content Validity Index (CVI). The scale’s internal consistency was assessed by calculating Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, McDonald’s Omega coefficient, corrected item-total correlations, and test-retest reliability. Additionally, the relationship between older adults’ feelings of being a burden and their general demographic characteristics was explored.

resultsThe EFA identified a three-factor structure, and the CFA indicated satisfactory model fit indices, all within acceptable thresholds. The CVI of the scale was 0.914, while Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega coefficients were 0.965 and 0.966, respectively. The corrected item-total correlations ranged from 0.607 ~ 0.825. The test-retest reliability was 0.763. Statistically significant differences in the level of burdensomeness were observed among older adults based on gender, marital status, chronic diseases, health status, and economic status (P < 0.05).

conclusionsThe GFBS is a reliable and effective tool for assessing the level of burden among older adults in China. It consists of three dimensions: economic and social burden, personal emotional burden, and social interaction burden. Among older adults, females, widowed individuals, those with chronic illnesses, those lacking a fixed income, and those in poor health experience a higher level of feelings of being a burden.

Indexed as

EmotionsGeriatric AssessmentPsychometricsQuality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesFeeling of burdenGeriatricReliabilityScaleValidity

Identifiers

PMID41444870
PMCPMC12729443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.