Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41444864›Full record

ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2025

Evolution's hidden architecture: a non-lipschitz theory of creation and catastrophe.

Miguel A Durán-Olivencia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Miguel A Durán-OlivenciaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. m.duran-olivencia@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModels of evolutionary dynamics have long been dominated by a paradigm of gradualism, yet the fossil record consistently points to a history defined by punctuation. This disconnect between theory and data has left major macroevolutionary events, such as punctuated equilibria, explosive radiations, and mass extinctions, without a unified first-principles explanation. We argue that this gap stems from a subtle ubiquitous assumption in theoretical models: that the underlying fitness landscapes are mathematically smooth (Lipschitz continuous).

resultsWe develop a theoretical framework based on relaxing this assumption, showing that non-Lipschitz dynamics are sufficient to make punctuation the default mode of evolution. We demonstrate that non-Lipschitz singularities, which arise naturally from known biological mechanisms like developmental constraints and ecological tipping points, provide a formal dynamical-systems basis for speciation as a bifurcation event and extinction as a finite-time singularity. Furthermore, we show that these dynamics are universal, appearing in contexts ranging from viral quasispecies to global biotas.

conclusionOur framework provides a new generative engine for macroevolutionary theory. It makes specific quantitative predictions for paleontological patterns, including the decoupling of disparity and diversity during adaptive radiations, and for the genomic signatures of lineages that undergo rapid evolution. By replacing the assumption of smoothness with non-Lipschitz continuity, we offer a rigorous mathematical reconciliation between gradualist models and the punctuated nature of the fossil record.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionModels, BiologicalAnimalsExtinction, BiologicalFossilsGenetic SpeciationDynamical systemsExtinctionLipschitz continuityMacroevolutionPunctuated equilibriaSpeciation

Identifiers

PMID41444864
PMCPMC12805756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.