Phase contrast CMR in the descending aorta as a supportive reference for severe aortic regurgitation.

Frida Truedsson, Sinsia A Gao, Christian L Polte, Odd Bech-Hanssen, Åse A Johnsson, Kerstin M Lagerstrand

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Frida TruedssonDepartment of Medical Radiation Sciences, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. frida.truedsson@regionhalland.se.ORCID 0000-0002-1344-3113

Sinsia A GaoInstitute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Christian L PolteInstitute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Odd Bech-HanssenInstitute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Åse A JohnssonDepartment of Radiology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Kerstin M LagerstrandDepartment of Medical Radiation Sciences, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate grading of aortic regurgitation (AR) severity is crucial for treatment decisions. This study aimed to determine whether phase contrast cardiac magnetic resonance (PC-CMR) in the descending aorta can be used as a supporting reference for grading of the AR severity in patients with chronic AR. PC-CMR was performed both in the ascending and descending aorta of 191 AR-patients. Regurgitation thresholds in the descending aorta for hemodynamically significant AR [regurgitation volume (RVol)

Indexed as

Aorta, ThoracicAortic Valve InsufficiencyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineAdultAgedFemaleHemodynamicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexAortic regurgitationAortic regurgitation severityDescending aortaPhase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonanceRegurgitation fractionRegurgitation volume

Identifiers

PMID41444810

DOI10.1038/s41598-025-31268-8

PMCPMC12749755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.