ArticleScientific reports2025
An open-source slicer for 3D mSLA printing of microfluidic chips.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microfluidic chips enable high-precision handling and automation of chemical and biological experiments by transporting and manipulating fluids through complex channel networks embedded on-chip. While polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) soft lithography remains the standard for microfluidic device fabrication, it is labor-intensive and requires specialized expertise. Masked stereolithography (mSLA) 3D printing offers a rapid, high-resolution alternative, where the 3D chip geometry is fabricated layer-by-layer. These layers are cross-sections of the geometry and stacked on top of each other. However, all existing "off the shelf" slicing processes are optimized for speed and printing outside features rather than the small channels inside microfluidic chips. As a result, the fabrication of these chips still frequently leads to imperfect quality as manifested, e.g., in clogged channels or rough surfaces, which influence the flow through these channels or even render the result unusable. In this work, we propose a novel slicing tool, OpenSLAice, that is optimized for 3D printing of microfluidic chips. To this end, we present a slicing method that automatically detects microfluidic features within a microfluidic chip and, then, orients the chip as well as dynamically slices it so that the imperfections in the fabrication of those features are avoided. It rasterizes the sliced cross-layers and, if several parts should be printed at the same time, it automatically arranges them. Finally, a single print exposure calibration is presented to efficiently determine the required exposure times per layer thickness for resin-printer combinations. The modular, open-source tool is available at https://github.com/cda-tum/mmft-openSLAice and allows to pre-process microfluidic chips for mSLA fabrication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.