Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41444776›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025

The value for money of artificial intelligence-empowered precision medicine: a systematic review and regression analysis.

Yue Zhang, Ziwei Lin, Yot Teerawattananon, Katika Akksilp, Alec Morton, Yi Wang, Thittaya Prapinvanich, Thamonwan Dulsamphan, Wenjia Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yue ZhangSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Ziwei LinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Yot TeerawattananonSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Katika AkksilpHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Alec MortonSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Yi WangSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Thittaya PrapinvanichYale-NUS College, Singapore, Singapore.
Thamonwan DulsamphanHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Wenjia ChenSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. wenjiach@nus.edu.sg.

Funding

the Health Systems Research Institute (HSRI), Thailand HSRI.67-127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence has empowered precision medicine (AI-PM) to transform healthcare. This study synthesized available evidence on the cost-effectiveness of AI-PM. We systematically searched five major databases for economic evaluations of AI-PM, extracted data, and assessed risk-of-bias using the Bias in Economic Evaluation (ECOBIAS) checklist. For cost-utility analyses, the value-for-money was quantitatively summarized, and regression analyses incorporating machine learning were conducted to explore value heterogeneity. Forty-eight economic evaluations were included, of which 31 were cost-utility analyses. Although risk-of-bias assessment indicated potential systematic optimism, AI-PM was cost-saving or cost-effective in 89% of base-case analyses, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranging from dominant to $129,174/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Interquartile ranges of incremental costs (-$259 to $28), QALY gains (0.001-0.019), and net monetary benefits (NMB; $18 to $986 at a willingness-to-pay threshold equal to one-time per-capita GDP) indicated modest health gains at minimal additional costs, and likely high value heterogeneity. Modeling choices and system-level factors were identified as essential sources of heterogeneity in estimated NMBs. Additional value assessment revealed low adaptability and underreported key value factors, leaving significant uncertainties in AI-PM adoption.

Identifiers

PMID41444776
PMCPMC12848305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.