ArticleScientific reports2025
Modulation of sepsis by Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus and the potential role of short-chain fatty acid levels in feces and blood.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating gut‑brain axis insights into bundled nutrition care for critically ill patients: From mechanisms to implementation (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2026Review
- Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Sepsis: Mechanisms of Action and Therapeutic Advances.Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The efficacy of probiotics for sepsis attenuation might be associated with the alteration of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). We investigated the impact of probiotics with the different production of SCFAs in vitro, including Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus strains fa1 and fg2 in mice with cecal ligation and puncture. Administration of either fa1 or fg2 probiotics, but not the heat-killed probiotics, prior to surgery effectively reduced sepsis severity. Metabolome analysis revealed elevated levels of acetate and 3-hydroxybutyrate in blood, whereas butyrate and propionate levels were diminished in the feces of sepsis mice compared to sham controls. Both probiotics similarly attenuated sepsis-induced gut dysbiosis, as indicated by the normalized Firmicutes and reduced Proteobacteria (fecal microbiome analysis), with the similar levels of fecal SCFAs. In parallel, the administration of butyrate, but not acetate, partly attenuated sepsis severity (gut permeability and serum TNF-α). Conditioned media from both probiotic strains or butyrate demonstrated a protective effect against enterocyte injury following activation by Klebsiella pneumoniae lysate, irrespective of their SCFAs production. To support the possible use of SCFAs in sepsis, the lower serum SCFAs in patients with sepsis compared to healthy controls was demonstrated. In conclusion, both fa1 and fg2 attenuated sepsis severity, partly through the increased levels of SCFAs. These findings endorse the potential of probiotics in preventing sepsis and the use of SCFAs for sepsis disease monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.