Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41444735›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Ecosystem carbon use efficiency at global scale from upscaling eddy-covariance data with machine learning and MODIS products.

M Campos-Taberner, M A Gilabert, S Sánchez-Ruiz, B Martínez, A Jiménez-Guisado, F J García-Haro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M Campos-TabernerEnvironmental Remote Sensing group (UV-ERS), Universitat de València, Dr. Moliner, Burjassot, València, 46100, Spain. manuel.campos@uv.es.
M A GilabertEnvironmental Remote Sensing group (UV-ERS), Universitat de València, Dr. Moliner, Burjassot, València, 46100, Spain.
S Sánchez-RuizEnvironmental Remote Sensing group (UV-ERS), Universitat de València, Dr. Moliner, Burjassot, València, 46100, Spain.
B MartínezEnvironmental Remote Sensing group (UV-ERS), Universitat de València, Dr. Moliner, Burjassot, València, 46100, Spain.
A Jiménez-GuisadoEnvironmental Remote Sensing group (UV-ERS), Universitat de València, Dr. Moliner, Burjassot, València, 46100, Spain.
F J García-HaroEnvironmental Remote Sensing group (UV-ERS), Universitat de València, Dr. Moliner, Burjassot, València, 46100, Spain.

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2020-118036RB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbon use efficiency (CUE) is a key indicator in coupled biological-abiotic systems that accounts for their capacity of effectively retain carbon, offering insights of ecosystem functioning and the dynamics of carbon cycle. Generally, CUE assessments have been limited to an autotrophic perspective, quantifying plant efficiency while neglecting carbon losses from heterotrophic respiration. This provides an incomplete view of ecosystem carbon retention. To address this critical gap, we offer a global quantification of a more holistic ecosystem-level CUE, that incorporates all respiratory fluxes. This paper proposes a methodology for mapping ecosystem CUE at global scale from in situ data, remote sensing observations and machine learning. This data-driven approach exploits a Gaussian Processes Regression (GPR) model trained with CUE from eddy-covariance towers and concomitant observations from the Moderate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). The performance of the model shows high correspondence (R

Indexed as

Carbon use efficiency (CUE)Eddy-covariance dataMachine learningMODISSpatiotemporal variability

Identifiers

PMID41444735
PMCPMC12738764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.