ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhancing groundwater level prediction with a hybrid deep learning model in Jinan City, China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate prediction of groundwater levels (GWL) is critical for sustainable utilization and scientific management of groundwater resources. However, precise forecasting of GWL fluctuations faces significant challenges due to the complex nonlinear coupling effects of hydrogeological conditions and hydro-meteorological factors. In recent years, research on GWL prediction based on deep learning models has become a cutting-edge topic in the field of hydrogeology. This study focused on Jinan City, China, and constructed a novel hybrid deep learning model that integrates graph neural networks to capture spatial relationships and recurrent neural networks to model temporal dynamics, effectively learning the complex spatio-temporal patterns in the data, namely the Spatio-Temporal Graph Prediction Model (STGPM). Our approach uniquely captures both hydrological connectivity between monitoring wells and multi-scale temporal dependencies, overcoming key limitations of conventional time-series models. Comparative experiments demonstrate that STGPM outperforms the benchmark models on the test set, achieving the lowest prediction errors (MAE = 0.039, RMSE = 0.052) and the highest coefficient of determination (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.