ArticleScientific reports2025
A data-driven approach for risk assessment and material identification of buried objects using microwave measurements and neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Buried object detection plays a critical role in a wide range of applications, including defense, security screening, and subsurface sensing. Traditional microwave-based techniques often depend on handcrafted features or manual interpretation of measurement data, which limits their robustness and accuracy in complex or cluttered environments. To address these challenges, this study presents a deep neural network model trained on experimental multi-frequency microwave S-parameter data for the automated detection and classification of buried objects. The proposed framework processes 21×21 S-parameter matrices to capture the electromagnetic response of the subsurface medium. It classifies each sample into three distinct categories: safe, plastic-based threat, and metal-based threat. The model achieves an accuracy of 0.9647, precision of 0.9677, recall of 0.9647, and an F1 score of 0.9635, demonstrating consistent performance across all evaluation metrics. By learning directly from real, experimentally measured data, the network effectively models the complex relationship between microwave responses and object characteristics, eliminating the need for simulation-based data or handcrafted features. These findings represent a substantial step toward the realization of practical, data-driven microwave detection systems, offering improved reliability, scalability, and operational potential for future security and defense applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.