ArticleHuman genomics2025
Forensic utilization of NGS-STRs and evaluation of system efficacy for different kinship identifications.
Article in Human genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Problems and Challenges with Analysis of Short Tandem Repeats (STRs) in Animal DNA.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Beyond the Core: The Role of Supplementary Short Tandem Repeats in Forensic Genetics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe accurate identification of complex kinship relationships remains a significant challenge in forensic practice. Traditional kinship identification methods, which primarily rely on length polymorphisms of short tandem repeats (STRs), often face difficulty in achieving sufficient discriminatory power for complex relationships due to the limited genetic information they provide. While next-generation sequencing (NGS) enables the detection of allelic sequence polymorphisms within STRs, its practical value for different kinship analyses in specific populations requires comprehensive evaluation. To this end, the present study investigated the genetic polymorphisms of 52 STRs, with a focus on both length and sequence variations, aiming to evaluate the system efficacy and forensic application value of the amplification system in the forensic identification of complex kinship analyses.
resultsThe 52 STRs were highly polymorphic in the studied Baoan group. The acquisition of sequence polymorphism information significantly enhanced the genetic polymorphisms of STRs, and the number of alleles increased by 61.00% compared to length-based polymorphisms alone. Kinship performance was evaluated by simulating 1,000 kinship pairs and 1,000 unrelated individual pairs on the basis of the allele frequencies of 52 STRs, and the influence of different combinations of STR loci on the identification efficacies of different kinship was assessed by using the likelihood ratio (LR) method and identical by state (IBS) method, respectively. When the LR was greater than 10,000 or less than 0.0001 as the judgment threshold, the system efficacy of the 52 STR loci based on sequence polymorphisms for forensic identifications of full siblings and unrelated individuals was 99.85%, and those of half-siblings, grandparents-grandchildren, uncle-nephews and unrelated individuals were 61.50%, 60.95%, and 61.00%, respectively.
conclusionsThe availability of sequence polymorphism data and the increased number of STR loci could enhance the efficacy of the detection systems for kinship identifications to a certain extent. These results highlight the potential of combining length and sequence polymorphisms of STRs in forensic practice, offering a valuable tool for addressing the challenge of complex kinship identification. Future research should validate these thresholds in casework samples and expand the number of STR loci to enhance the detection efficacy for distant relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.