Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41444709›Full record

ArticleHuman genomics2025

Forensic utilization of NGS-STRs and evaluation of system efficacy for different kinship identifications.

Hui Xu, Hongbing Yao, Xi Yuan, Qiong Lan, Yifeng Lin, Xiaolian Wu, Qinglin Liang, Qinglin Liu, Lisiteng Luo, Bofeng Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hui XuGuangzhou Key Laboratory of Forensic Multi-Omics for Precision Identification, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Hongbing YaoBelt and Road Research Center for Forensic Molecular Anthropology, Key Laboratory of Evidence Science of Gansu Province, Gansu University of Political Science and Law, Lanzhou, 730070, China.
Xi YuanGuangzhou Key Laboratory of Forensic Multi-Omics for Precision Identification, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Qiong LanGuangzhou Key Laboratory of Forensic Multi-Omics for Precision Identification, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Yifeng LinGuangzhou Key Laboratory of Forensic Multi-Omics for Precision Identification, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Xiaolian WuGuangzhou Key Laboratory of Forensic Multi-Omics for Precision Identification, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Qinglin LiangGuangzhou Key Laboratory of Forensic Multi-Omics for Precision Identification, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Qinglin LiuGuangzhou Key Laboratory of Forensic Multi-Omics for Precision Identification, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Lisiteng LuoGuangzhou Key Laboratory of Forensic Multi-Omics for Precision Identification, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Bofeng ZhuGuangzhou Key Laboratory of Forensic Multi-Omics for Precision Identification, School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China. zhubofeng7372@126.com.

Funding

Gansu Provincial Higher Education Industrial Support Project No. 2023CYZC-59National Natural Science Foundation of China No.82293652
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe accurate identification of complex kinship relationships remains a significant challenge in forensic practice. Traditional kinship identification methods, which primarily rely on length polymorphisms of short tandem repeats (STRs), often face difficulty in achieving sufficient discriminatory power for complex relationships due to the limited genetic information they provide. While next-generation sequencing (NGS) enables the detection of allelic sequence polymorphisms within STRs, its practical value for different kinship analyses in specific populations requires comprehensive evaluation. To this end, the present study investigated the genetic polymorphisms of 52 STRs, with a focus on both length and sequence variations, aiming to evaluate the system efficacy and forensic application value of the amplification system in the forensic identification of complex kinship analyses.

resultsThe 52 STRs were highly polymorphic in the studied Baoan group. The acquisition of sequence polymorphism information significantly enhanced the genetic polymorphisms of STRs, and the number of alleles increased by 61.00% compared to length-based polymorphisms alone. Kinship performance was evaluated by simulating 1,000 kinship pairs and 1,000 unrelated individual pairs on the basis of the allele frequencies of 52 STRs, and the influence of different combinations of STR loci on the identification efficacies of different kinship was assessed by using the likelihood ratio (LR) method and identical by state (IBS) method, respectively. When the LR was greater than 10,000 or less than 0.0001 as the judgment threshold, the system efficacy of the 52 STR loci based on sequence polymorphisms for forensic identifications of full siblings and unrelated individuals was 99.85%, and those of half-siblings, grandparents-grandchildren, uncle-nephews and unrelated individuals were 61.50%, 60.95%, and 61.00%, respectively.

conclusionsThe availability of sequence polymorphism data and the increased number of STR loci could enhance the efficacy of the detection systems for kinship identifications to a certain extent. These results highlight the potential of combining length and sequence polymorphisms of STRs in forensic practice, offering a valuable tool for addressing the challenge of complex kinship identification. Future research should validate these thresholds in casework samples and expand the number of STR loci to enhance the detection efficacy for distant relationships.

Indexed as

Forensic GeneticsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicrosatellite RepeatsAllelesGene FrequencyHumansPolymorphism, GeneticBaoan peopleKinship identificationNext-generation sequencingShort tandem repeat

Identifiers

PMID41444709
PMCPMC12729311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.