Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41444706›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2025

Dynamic picture of the pig gut's microbiota under normal and pathological conditions.

Inés García Viñado, Federico Correa, Paolo Trevisi, Giuseppe Bee, Catherine Ollagnier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Inés García ViñadoSwine Research Unit, Agroscope, Route de La Tioleyre 4, 1725, Posieux, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3027-7513
Federico CorreaDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL), University of Bologna, Viale G Fanin 44, 40127, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8558-6503
Paolo TrevisiDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL), University of Bologna, Viale G Fanin 44, 40127, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7019-6828
Giuseppe BeeSwine Research Unit, Agroscope, Route de La Tioleyre 4, 1725, Posieux, Switzerland. giuseppe.bee@agroscope.admin.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6397-7543
Catherine OllagnierSwine Research Unit, Agroscope, Route de La Tioleyre 4, 1725, Posieux, Switzerland. catherine.ollagnier@agroscope.admin.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3725-7611

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council 955374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent advancements in sequencing technologies and associated bioinformatic tools have eased the analyses of the factors influencing variability in host-associated microbial communities in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Although extensive research has focused on fecal microbiota, the small intestine represents a critical, yet less explored, site for understanding the interplay between microbiota, diet, and host health. Study 1 employed CapSa, a non-invasive sampling capsule, to collect microbiota at five distinct administration time points. The aim was to use amplicon sequencing to investigate changes in the small intestine microbiome composition throughout the grower-finisher pig lifespan. Study 2 examined the long-term impact of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) F4 infections, which cause post-weaning diarrhea (PWD), on small intestine microbiota dynamics. The study provides insights into the long-term responses of microbiota after a short pathological challenge.

resultsIn both studies, microbiota analysis of the small intestinal content revealed that Firmicutes predominated across all samples, and at weaning, Lactobacillaceae and Lactobacillus were the most abundant. In Study 1, following CapSa administration, Clostridium sensu stricto 1 and Terrisporobacter increased with age/body weight and at slaughter, Streptococcaceae dominated. Significant differences in microbial composition were observed based on sample type and diet, indicating dynamic shifts throughout the pigs' lives under normal conditions. In Study 2, the abundance of Lactobacillaceae was consistently lower in ETEC-infected pigs. At slaughter, only minimal differences in microbial composition emerged based on the early post-weaning infection status in specific small intestine segments, indicating dynamic infection-induced shifts in the gut microbiota composition. The CapSa sampling method was successful, with a retrieval rate higher than 70% in both studies.

conclusionsThis study monitored porcine intestinal microbiota dynamics using an ingestible capsule. In healthy pigs, microbial composition changes occurred from post-weaning to slaughter. In contrast, ETEC infection only minimally altered communities, though small differences at slaughter suggest lasting impacts.

Indexed as

Capsule samplingETEC infectionMicrobiotaSmall intestine

Identifiers

PMID41444706
PMCPMC12729155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.