ArticleAnimal microbiome2025
Dynamic picture of the pig gut's microbiota under normal and pathological conditions.
Article in Animal microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecent advancements in sequencing technologies and associated bioinformatic tools have eased the analyses of the factors influencing variability in host-associated microbial communities in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Although extensive research has focused on fecal microbiota, the small intestine represents a critical, yet less explored, site for understanding the interplay between microbiota, diet, and host health. Study 1 employed CapSa, a non-invasive sampling capsule, to collect microbiota at five distinct administration time points. The aim was to use amplicon sequencing to investigate changes in the small intestine microbiome composition throughout the grower-finisher pig lifespan. Study 2 examined the long-term impact of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) F4 infections, which cause post-weaning diarrhea (PWD), on small intestine microbiota dynamics. The study provides insights into the long-term responses of microbiota after a short pathological challenge.
resultsIn both studies, microbiota analysis of the small intestinal content revealed that Firmicutes predominated across all samples, and at weaning, Lactobacillaceae and Lactobacillus were the most abundant. In Study 1, following CapSa administration, Clostridium sensu stricto 1 and Terrisporobacter increased with age/body weight and at slaughter, Streptococcaceae dominated. Significant differences in microbial composition were observed based on sample type and diet, indicating dynamic shifts throughout the pigs' lives under normal conditions. In Study 2, the abundance of Lactobacillaceae was consistently lower in ETEC-infected pigs. At slaughter, only minimal differences in microbial composition emerged based on the early post-weaning infection status in specific small intestine segments, indicating dynamic infection-induced shifts in the gut microbiota composition. The CapSa sampling method was successful, with a retrieval rate higher than 70% in both studies.
conclusionsThis study monitored porcine intestinal microbiota dynamics using an ingestible capsule. In healthy pigs, microbial composition changes occurred from post-weaning to slaughter. In contrast, ETEC infection only minimally altered communities, though small differences at slaughter suggest lasting impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.