ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2025
Detection of cystoid macular edema in patients with retinitis pigmentosa based on deep learning.
Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCystoid macular edema (CME) is a leading cause of vision loss in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP). The present study was aimed to CME in patients with RP using deep learning (DL) models based on the analysis of the optical coherence tomography (OCT) images.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, a total of 1,318 OCT scans of 296 eyes from RP patients were analyzed with scans grouped based on the presence (670 images) or absence (648 images) of CME. We used Spectral-Domain OCT (SD-OCT) to measure central foveal thickness and detect retinal abnormalities, including subclinical CME in the study groups. The dataset was stratified and divided into training and testing sets using a subject-wise split at an 80:20 ratio using the scikit-learn library. Resnet-34 and ResNet-18 model architectures were developed to automatically detect CME in RP patients, and their performance was evaluated and compared with other DL algorithms.
resultsFine-tuning pretrained ResNet-34 and ResNet-18 models achieved an accuracy of 99.25%, 98.75%, F1-score of 99.26%, 98.77% and ROC of 99% and non-pretrained ResNet-34 and ResNet-18 achieved an accuracy of 80.64%, 82.13%, F1-score of 83.88%, 84.87% and ROC of 80%, 82% in detection of CME in RP patients.
conclusionThis study was the first to apply DL algorithms to diagnose and manage CME in RP patients using OCT images. Pretrained ResNet models, particularly ResNet-34 with 99.25% accuracy, outperformed non-pretrained ResNet-34 with 80.64% accuracy. These results underscore the potential of pretrained models to aid in detection CME and supporting remote healthcare services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.