ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
External validation of the updated international IgA nephropathy prediction tool in a Chinese population.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Segmental Glomerulosclerosis Subclassification in the Oxford Classification System (MEST-C) Improves the International IgA Nephropathy Prediction Tool.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Urinary IL-18 predicts progression of IgA nephropathy.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- External validation of the international IgA nephropathy prediction tool in a Thai cohort.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe updated post-biopsy International IgA Nephropathy (IgAN) Prediction Tool (IIgAN-PT) requires validation in diverse clinical settings. We evaluated its performance in a Chinese cohort characterized by severe pathology and aggressive immunosuppression therapy.
methodsPatients with biopsy-confirmed IgAN from two medical centers in China were included. We calculated the predicted risk for each patient. The primary outcome was the first occurrence of end-stage kidney disease(ESKD, eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73 m
resultsIn our cohort, 14.1% of patients experienced the primary outcome. The updated post-biopsy IIgAN-PT did not demonstrate significantly superior discriminatory ability as compared to the original biopsy IIgAN-PT. Kaplan-Meier curves for risk subgroups showed poor separation in low- and intermediate-risk groups but marked separation in the high-risk group. However, the calibration performance of the post-biopsy IIgAN-PT improved. The updated IIgAN-PT significantly improved the Net Reclassification Index(NRI) compared to the original IIgAN-PT, but showed limited improvement in Integrated Discrimination Improvement(IDI) for clinical risk reclassification. Subgroup analysis indicated that immunosuppression therapy significantly reduced the model's discriminatory ability.
conclusionIn this external validation, the updated post-biopsy IIgAN-PT demonstrated improved calibration over the original IIgAN-PT for risk assessment at 1-year post-biopsy, leading to more accurate absolute risk estimates. However, due to the limitations of the updated IIgAN-PT in distinguishing between low-risk and intermediate-risk patient groups, its application value for refined risk stratification in clinical decision-making is constrained. Registry: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, TRN: ChiCTR2400093550, Registration date: 06 December 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.