Trial reportBMC medicine2025
Three vs 12-month DAPT after implantation of biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting coronary stent: a randomised clinical trial.
Trial report in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03008083 (A Prospective Multi-center Open-label Controlled Trial of Comparison 3 vs 12 Months of Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy After Implantation of Firehawk Sirolimus Target- Eluting Stent in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Multi-center Open-label Controlled Trial of Comparison 3 vs 12 Months of Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy After Implantation of Firehawk Sirolimus Target- Eluting Stent in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- [Modern concepts in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) within 3 months after implantation of drug-eluting stents may reduce bleeding risk without increasing ischaemic events. This study aimed to assess whether 3-month DAPT is as safe as the conventional 12-month regimen in patients treated with Firehawk stents, which have demonstrated 99.9% reendothelialisation at 3 months by optical coherence tomography.
methodsFrom January 1, 2019, to April 30, 2022, 2445 patients were randomly assigned to a 3-month (n = 1222) or 12-month DAPT regimen (n = 1223) in this randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial, patients from 36 centres in China who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with Firehawk stents. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, and major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5) at 18 months. The co-equal secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction and ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation, and major bleeding.
resultsFrom January 1, 2019, to April 30, 2022, 2445 patients were randomly assigned to 3-month (N = 1222) or 12-month DAPT regimen (N = 1223). Adherence to the protocol-defined DAPT duration was 71.0% and 95.5%, respectively. Rates of the primary endpoint were comparable between both groups (10.1% vs 10.9%). Non-inferiority of 3-month DAPT was established (absolute rate difference, - 0.76%; upper limit of 1-sided 97.5% CI, 1.70%; p non-inferiority = 0.0003, with a predefined non-inferiority margin of 3.5%). Rates of co-secondary endpoints showed no significant difference (both p > 0.05). Landmark analysis (3-18 months) showed significant lower rate of major bleeding (2.7% vs 4.4%; p = 0.03) with 3-month DAPT.
conclusionsIn patients treated with Firehawk stents, 3-month DAPT was non-inferior to 12-month DAPT for the primary composite endpoint of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, and major bleeding at 18 months.
trial registrationNCT03008083 (clinicaltrials.gov).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.