ArticleBMC medical genomics2025
Genetic disorders caused by consanguineous marriage in Radfan districts - Yemen.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConsanguineous marriage (≥ second cousins) is prevalent in Yemen (40-50%) and linked to increased genetic disorders. This study assesses its prevalence and health impacts in Radfan districts. METHODOLOGY: A 2024 cross-sectional study of 1065 randomly selected households. Data were collected via validated questionnaires supplemented by medical records where available. Analyses included consanguinity rates, inbreeding coefficients (F), sociocultural factors, and clinically validated genetic disorders. Statistical analysis employed χ² tests, multivariable logistic regression (adjusted ORs), and Cohen's d for effect sizes.
resultsThe consanguinity rate was 57.46%, significantly higher in rural (37.09%) than urban areas (20.38%). Wives with a university education had a 71.9% lower likelihood of consanguineous marriage (adjusted OR = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.18-0.44). Consanguineous couples had significantly higher odds of adverse outcomes compared to non-consanguineous couples, including abortion (adjusted OR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.4-2.3), child mortality (adjusted OR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.6-2.8), blood disorders (adjusted OR = 3.5; 95% CI: 1.7-7.4), and disabilities (adjusted OR = 2.6; 95% CI: 1.4-4.8). Blood disorders were predominantly hemoglobinopathies (87%). The mean inbreeding coefficient was F = 0.0625 (first-cousin equivalent).
conclusionsThe high prevalence of consanguineous marriages is a significant, modifiable risk factor for the increased burden of genetic disorders in the population. Addressing this urgent public health challenge requires a multi-faceted strategy: implementing mandatory premarital screening for hemoglobinopathies, launching community-based genetic literacy programs, and establishing economic incentives to encourage non-consanguineous unions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.