ArticleBMC primary care2025
Evolving core values in family medicine across regions: a global scoping review.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Professional identity formation of family medicine residents in Singapore: a qualitative study to identify influencing factors.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFamily Medicine (FM) core values shape clinical practice, medical education, policy, and research. While universally recognised FM principles exist, their interpretation and implementation may vary significantly across different contexts, countries and time.
methodsThis scoping review systematically examined literature from diverse international sources to identify and analyse the evolving core values of FM. Relevant studies were reviewed to determine common themes, variations, contextual influences shaping FM and emerging themes.
resultsTwenty-one studies were included. Core values such as person-centred care, continuity, comprehensiveness, and coordination featured prominently across the literature. Although these traditional values persisted, their interpretations and prioritisations varied significantly according to geopolitical and healthcare system structures. Regional differences reflected local workforce structures, healthcare challenges, and sociopolitical context. High-income regions emphasised values like relational care, stewardship, and advocacy reflecting evolving expectations towards social responsiveness. Lower-resourced areas prioritised accessibility, procedural competence, and team-based leadership, responding pragmatically to infrastructural constraints. Over time, new values such as sustainability, comfort with complexity, and social accountability have emerged, indicating global concern for equity, physician well-being and proactive public engagement. DISCUSSION: This review highlights a dynamic landscape of FM values, shaped by both universal principles and local adaptation. As countries refine their health systems and FM roles, there is a need for value frameworks that are both globally informed and locally grounded. Clear articulation of values will guide education, policy, research, and professional identity, ensuring that FM remains responsive and relevant amidst evolving healthcare landscapes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.