ArticleScientific reports2025
Joint attention GAN for medical report generation with clinical style preservation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medical report generation, which aims to reduce workload of doctors and improve diagnosis efficiency, can be always concerned and significant. Currently, many medical report generation methods are proposed to automatically generate diagnosis report. However, it is challenging to generate semantically coherent paragraphs with accurate location and clinical language style. To address these, we, in this paper, propose novel medical report generation method based on generative adversarial networks with joint attention. Within it, an adversarial framework is designed to achieve high-quality medical report generation where generator generates diagnosis report meanwhile discriminator is used to distinguish authenticity and evaluator is utilized to preserve clinical style, respectively. During generation, joint attention is proposed to enhance and fuse visual and textual feature to capture high-order interactions among cross-modal features, which is desired for accurate location and filling visual-to-pathological gap. Then, language evaluator is introduced to preserve clinical language style and yield acceptable and readable report by clinicians. Besides, we propose gradient search-based Pareto optimal (GSPO) strategy for multi-objective GANs, which uses hard parameter sharing to determine multi-objective weight parameters and performs linear search along gradient direction to search Pareto optimal solution. Extensive experiments show that our method gains competitive performance comparing with other state-of-the-art medical report generation methods. Specifically, ours achieves average increments of 6.2% BLEU-2, 8.1% BLEU-3, 7.4% ROUGE and 13.1% MIRQI. Additionally, ours outperforms than other comparisons in clinical language style evaluation by radiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.