ArticleBone marrow transplantation2026
A European survey on allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT: focus on 'real world' experience of JAK inhibitors, splenomegaly management and novel agents in the transplant algorithm.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only potentially curative option for patients with myelofibrosis (MF), yet the integration of JAK inhibitors (JAKi) and novel agents into transplant pathways has created increasing complexity. To capture current real-world practice, the EBMT Chronic Malignancies Working Party conducted a survey of 19 high-volume European centres performing MF allo-HCT. Most centres (68%) routinely initiated JAKi, primarily ruxolitinib, in transplant-eligible patients prior to conditioning, with goals of splenomegaly reduction and symptom control. Management of ruxolitinib intolerance or resistance was heterogeneous, with strategies including switching to alternative JAKi, proceeding directly to allo-HCT, or enroling in clinical trials. Peri-transplant approaches also varied: over half of centres continued ruxolitinib throughout conditioning, while others employed tapering or abrupt discontinuation. Experience with newer JAKi and investigational therapies was limited. Post-transplant, most centres did not routinely reintroduce JAKi, although some used them for relapse or GVHD mitigation. Notably, many centres reported transplant delays due to prolonged medical therapy, with adverse consequences including disease progression. These findings highlight significant heterogeneity in practice, which is likely to increase as more novel agents are integrated in treatment algorithms. Harmonised, multidisciplinary guidelines to optimise timing and outcomes for MF patients eligible for allo-HCT are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.