ArticleNature methods2026
DynamicAtlas: a morphodynamic atlas for Drosophila development.
Article in Nature methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tissue maps in motion.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Dynamical systems of fate and form in development.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2025Review
- Blender tissue cartography: an intuitive tool for the analysis of dynamic 3D microscopy data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- The Geometric Basis of Epithelial Convergent Extension.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- TubULAR: tracking in toto deformations of dynamic tissues via constrained maps.Nature methods · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Living organisms develop their shape through the interplay of gene expression and mechanics. While atlases of static samples characterize cell fates and gene regulation, understanding dynamic shape changes requires live imaging. Here we present DynamicAtlas: a 'morphodynamic atlas' of live and static datasets from 500 Drosophila melanogaster embryos (wild type and 18 mutants), aligned to a common morphological timeline. Surprisingly, characterizing wild-type surface tissue flows reveals distinct 'morphodynamic modules'-time periods in which the global pattern of motion is stationary-corresponding to key developmental stages. Mutant analysis shows stationary flow patterns depend on genes that break spatial symmetry along the dorsal-ventral axis. Temperature perturbations indicate that morphodynamic modules change in response to accumulated tissue deformation, rather than elapsed time. Extending our approach to the embryonic Drosophila midgut, we find modules in covariant measures of the dynamic three-dimensional surface. DynamicAtlas provides a high-resolution framework for studying shape formation across living systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.