Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41444410›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning of clinical and neural data predicts future homicide in high-risk youth.

Samantha N Rodriguez, Aparna R Gullapalli, David D Stephenson, J Michael Maurer, Keith A Harenski, Carla L Harenski, Kent A Kiehl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samantha N RodriguezThe Mind Research Network, 1101 Yale Blvd NE, Albuquerque, NM, 87106, United States of America.
Aparna R GullapalliThe Mind Research Network, 1101 Yale Blvd NE, Albuquerque, NM, 87106, United States of America.
David D StephensonThe Mind Research Network, 1101 Yale Blvd NE, Albuquerque, NM, 87106, United States of America.
J Michael MaurerThe Mind Research Network, 1101 Yale Blvd NE, Albuquerque, NM, 87106, United States of America.
Keith A HarenskiThe Mind Research Network, 1101 Yale Blvd NE, Albuquerque, NM, 87106, United States of America.
Carla L HarenskiThe Mind Research Network, 1101 Yale Blvd NE, Albuquerque, NM, 87106, United States of America.
Kent A KiehlThe Mind Research Network, 1101 Yale Blvd NE, Albuquerque, NM, 87106, United States of America. kkiehl@unm.edu.

Funding

Externalizing outcomes in high risk youthR01HD092331 · NICHD · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI KIEHL, KENT A · 2017 to 2022
$3.5M
NEUROCOGNITIVE ASSESSMENT OF 'CALLOUS' CONDUCT DISORDERED YOUTHR01MH071896 · NIMH · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI KIEHL, KENT A · 2006 to 2010
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD092331NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH071896NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH071896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homicide is one of the most severe forms of violence and is the single most costly crime in the United States. Despite its high financial cost and incalculable emotional toll, we know very little about predicting who will commit such crimes. Here we followed a large (n = 202) sample of incarcerated youth for 16 years after release from a maximum-security juvenile correctional facility. Official records and clinical interviews indicated n = 35 committed a homicide during this follow-up period. Clinical (psychopathic traits, age of first arrest) and neural variables (gray matter volume of the amygdala and temporal pole) collected at baseline while boys were housed at the correctional facility significantly differed between homicide and non-homicide (n = 167) groups. Classification through machine learning models using these clinical and neural data predicted which formerly incarcerated youth committed a future homicide as adults with high accuracy. The model which included a priori clinical (psychopathic traits) and neural variables (bilateral amygdala, insula, parahippocampal gyrus, middle temporal pole, superior temporal pole, and orbitofrontal cortex) achieved top performance with 76% accuracy (sensitivity = 86%; specificity = 75%). The implications of these results are discussed as they relate to intervention and prevention efforts.

Indexed as

HomicideMachine LearningAdolescentAmygdalaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsForensic psychologyHomicideJuvenile offendersMachine learningNeuroimagingPrediction

Identifiers

PMID41444410
PMCPMC12827941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.