ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning of clinical and neural data predicts future homicide in high-risk youth.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Homicide is one of the most severe forms of violence and is the single most costly crime in the United States. Despite its high financial cost and incalculable emotional toll, we know very little about predicting who will commit such crimes. Here we followed a large (n = 202) sample of incarcerated youth for 16 years after release from a maximum-security juvenile correctional facility. Official records and clinical interviews indicated n = 35 committed a homicide during this follow-up period. Clinical (psychopathic traits, age of first arrest) and neural variables (gray matter volume of the amygdala and temporal pole) collected at baseline while boys were housed at the correctional facility significantly differed between homicide and non-homicide (n = 167) groups. Classification through machine learning models using these clinical and neural data predicted which formerly incarcerated youth committed a future homicide as adults with high accuracy. The model which included a priori clinical (psychopathic traits) and neural variables (bilateral amygdala, insula, parahippocampal gyrus, middle temporal pole, superior temporal pole, and orbitofrontal cortex) achieved top performance with 76% accuracy (sensitivity = 86%; specificity = 75%). The implications of these results are discussed as they relate to intervention and prevention efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.