ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparison of multi-miRNA models from donor-matched plasma and cerebrospinal fluid as candidate biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Role of Exosome-miRNA as Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review of Case-Control and Longitudinal Studies.Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2026Pooled it
- Plasma multi-miRNA models classify Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and Lewy body dementia.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We discovered and validated miRNA biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) in human cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). However, as more easily accessible biofluids are preferred for clinical assays, we compared the performance of the AD miRNAs in CSF to plasma to determine their potential use as AD biomarkers in this readily available biofluid. We obtained 320 donor- and date-matched normal control (NC) and AD CSF and plasma samples from the AD Neuroimaging Initiative, then analyzed 57 candidate AD miRNAs in both biofluids by RT-qPCR. For analysis, we divided the sample sets into 80% for discovery and 20% for validation. We then used predictive modeling of the 57 candidate AD miRNAs in the discovery phase to develop AD classifiers for each biofluid that showed similar performance in both CSF and plasma. However, in the validation phase AD classification performance was only maintained for the plasma models. When the plasma miRNA models were combined with clinical predictors (APOE genotype, age, sex, years of education) there was a boost in classification performance to a level comparable to the CSF proteins (Aβ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.