ArticleScientific reports2025
JAK-1 inhibitors in the management of atopic dermatitis in patients over 65 years old: a descriptive cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Atopic Dermatitis: A Global Bibliometric Analysis (2015-2025).Journal of clinical practice and research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) can affect older adults. Janus kinase inhibitors (JAK-1 inhibitors), such as upadacitinib and abrocitinib, have emerged as effective treatments for moderate-to-severe AD. However, data on their safety and efficacy in older adults remain limited due to underrepresentation in clinical trials. This retrospective cross-sectional study examined the efficacy and safety of oral JAK-1 inhibitors in patients aged 65 years or older. Data was extracted from electronic medical records. Disease control was assessed using the Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT), while adverse events were analyzed. Statistical comparisons were conducted using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test. The study included 31 patients. Thirteen patients (42%) received abrocitinib, and 18 (58%) upadacitinib. The mean reduction in ADCT scores was − 84.4%, with a slightly greater improvement observed in abrocitinib users (-5.1%, p < 0.001). Mild adverse events were reported in 21 patients (68%), while 26% experienced no adverse effects. Two patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events. Both upadacitinib and abrocitinib demonstrated substantial efficacy in achieving long term AD control among older adults, with manageable safety profiles. These findings highlight the potential of JAK-1 inhibitors in this population while underscoring the need for personalized treatment approaches and further research in larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.