Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41444361›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Performance-based criteria for safe and circular digestate use in agriculture.

Thuane Mendes Anacleto, Helena Rodrigues Oliveira, Giacomo Carraro, Polina Skvortsova, Luka Šafarič, Sepehr Yekta Shakeri, Annika Björn, Érika Flávia Machado Pinheiros, Alex Enrich-Prast

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thuane Mendes AnacletoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biotecnologia Vegetal e Bioprocessos, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Helena Rodrigues OliveiraUnidade Multiusuário de Análises Ambientais, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Giacomo CarraroBiogas Solutions Research Center, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Polina SkvortsovaDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Protection Technologies, Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine.
Luka ŠafaričBiogas Solutions Research Center, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Sepehr Yekta ShakeriBiogas Solutions Research Center, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Annika BjörnBiogas Solutions Research Center, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Érika Flávia Machado PinheirosInstituto de Agronomia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Alex Enrich-PrastUnidade Multiusuário de Análises Ambientais, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. alex.enrich.prast@liu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion converts organic waste into renewable energy (biogas) and recyclable nutrients (digestate), generating over one billion tons of digestate annually. While this represents a major resource, its safe reuse remains a bottleneck for nutrient circularity, particularly for closing global nitrogen loops. We analyzed digestates from 23 full-scale digesters in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark across whole, liquid, and solid fractions using germination index (GI) assays and chemical profiling. Three parameters predicted phytotoxicity: total ammonia nitrogen (TAN ≥ 1,122 mg N L

Indexed as

AgricultureAmmoniaAnaerobiosisBiofuelsBoronDenmarkNitrogenNorwayPotassiumSwedenAmmoniaBiofuelsBoronNitrogenPotassiumBiofertilizerCircular economyNutrient recoveryPhytotoxicitySolid-liquid separation

Identifiers

PMID41444361
PMCPMC12834953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.