Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41444355›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Range-wide assessment of habitat suitability for jaguars using multiscale species distribution modelling.

Guilherme Costa Alvarenga, Caroline C Sartor, Samuel A Cushman, Alexandra Zimmermann, Ana Carolina Srbek-Araujo, Ana Cristina Mendes-Oliveira, Bart Harmsen, Carlos De Angelo, Carolina Franco Esteves, Claudia B de Campos and 28 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cryopreservation of jaguar (Animal reproduction · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

38 authors.

Guilherme Costa AlvarengaWildlife Conservation Research Unit (WildCRU), Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Life and Mind Building, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3EL, UK. guilherme.costaalvarenga@biology.ox.ac.uk.
Caroline C SartorWildlife Conservation Research Unit (WildCRU), Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Life and Mind Building, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3EL, UK.
Samuel A CushmanWildlife Conservation Research Unit (WildCRU), Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Life and Mind Building, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3EL, UK.
Alexandra ZimmermannWildlife Conservation Research Unit (WildCRU), Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Life and Mind Building, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3EL, UK.
Ana Carolina Srbek-AraujoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Animal e Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia de Ecossistemas, Universidade Vila Velha, Av. Comissário José Dantas de Melo, 21, Boa Vista, Vila Velha, Espírito Santo, 29102-920, Brazil.
Ana Cristina Mendes-OliveiraLaboratório de Ecologia e Zoologia de Vertebrados (LABEV/ICB), Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil.
Bart HarmsenPanthera, 104 West 40th Street, 5th Floor, New York, NY, 10018, USA.
Carlos De AngeloInstituto de Ciencias de la Tierra, Biodiversidad y Ambiente (IBCIA), Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto and National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Ruta Nacional 36 Km 601, Río Cuarto, Argentina.
Carolina Franco EstevesInstitute for the Conservation of Neotropical Carnivores, Avenida Horácio Neto, 1030, Parque Edmundo Zanoni, Atibaia, SP, Brazil.
Claudia B de CamposInstitute for the Conservation of Neotropical Carnivores, Avenida Horácio Neto, 1030, Parque Edmundo Zanoni, Atibaia, SP, Brazil.
Daiana Jeronimo PolliInstitute for the Conservation of Neotropical Carnivores, Avenida Horácio Neto, 1030, Parque Edmundo Zanoni, Atibaia, SP, Brazil.
Diego F Passos VianaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação, Instituto de Biociências - Inbio, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, 79070-900, Brazil.
Diogo Maia GräbinGrupo de Pesquisa em Ecologia e Conservação de Felinos na Amazônia, Mamirauá Institute for Sustainable Development (MISD), Estrada do Bexiga, nº 2584, Tefé, AM, Brazil.
Emiliano DonadioFundación Rewilding Argentina, Scalabrini Ortiz 3355, 1425, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Emiliano E RamalhoGrupo de Pesquisa em Ecologia e Conservação de Felinos na Amazônia, Mamirauá Institute for Sustainable Development (MISD), Estrada do Bexiga, nº 2584, Tefé, AM, Brazil.
Esteban PayánWCS Big Cat Program, New York, USA.
Fernando C C AzevedoInstitute for the Conservation of Neotropical Carnivores, Avenida Horácio Neto, 1030, Parque Edmundo Zanoni, Atibaia, SP, Brazil.
Francisco PalomaresDepartment of Conservation Biology, Doñana Biological Station, CSIC, Avda. Américo Vespucio 26, 41092, Isla de la Cartuja, Seville, Spain.
George V N PowellWildlife Protection Solutions, 2501 Welton Street, Denver, CO, 80205, USA.
Gerardo CeballosLaboratorio de Ecología y Conservación de Fauna Silvestre, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Grasiela PorfirioInstituto Homem Pantaneiro, Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Heliot ZarzaDepartamento de Ciencias Ambientales, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Lerma, CBS, Lerma de Villada, Mexico.
Ivonne CassaignePrimero Conservation, Box 158885935, Pinetop, AZ, USA.
Juliano A BogoniCentro de Pesquisa de Limnologia, Biodiversidade e Etnobiologia do Pantanal; Laboratório de Mastozoologia; Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Ambientais, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso-UNEMAT, Cáceres, MT, 78217-900, Brazil.
Leonardo SenaLaboratório de Ecologia e Zoologia de Vertebrados (LABEV/ICB), Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil.
Louise MaranhãoMamirauá Institute for Sustainable Development (MISD), Estrada do Bexiga, nº 2584, Tefé, AM, Brazil.
Marcos Roberto Monteiro de BritoGrupo de Pesquisa em Ecologia e Conservação de Felinos na Amazônia, Mamirauá Institute for Sustainable Development (MISD), Estrada do Bexiga, nº 2584, Tefé, AM, Brazil.
Mathias W ToblerSan Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, Conservation Science and Wildlife Health, 15600 San Pasqual Valley Road, Escondido, CA, 92027, USA.
Øystein WiigNatural History Museum, University of Oslo, POB 1172 Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway.
Rebecca J FosterPanthera, 104 West 40th Street, 5th Floor, New York, NY, 10018, USA.
Ricardo SampaioCentro Nacional de Pesquisa e Conservação de Mamíferos Carnívoros (CENAP-ICMBio), Estrada Municipal Hisaichi Takebayashi, 8600, Atibaia, SP, 12952-011, Brazil.
Rodrigo NuñezAlianza Jaguar AC, Lab. Vida Silvestre, Fac. Biol. Universidad Michoacana, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico.
Ronaldo G MoratoPanthera, 104 West 40th Street, 5th Floor, New York, NY, 10018, USA.
Valeria BoronWorld Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) UK, The Living Planet Centre, Brewery Road, Woking, GU214LL, UK.
Wener Hugo Arruda MorenoInstituto Homem Pantaneiro, Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Yadvinder MalhiEnvironmental Change Institute, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, UK.
David W MacdonaldWildlife Conservation Research Unit (WildCRU), Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Life and Mind Building, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3EL, UK.
Żaneta KasztaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Jaguars (Panthera onca) are highly sensitive to persecution, habitat loss, and fragmentation, making the identification of suitable habitat critical for conservation planning. Using GPS telemetry data from 172 individuals across eight countries - the largest jaguar dataset to date - we developed multiscale Resource Selection Functions (RSFs) incorporating 15 environmental covariates to model habitat suitability across the species' historic range. Jaguars selected productive habitats near water and strongly avoided human-modified landscapes, including areas with high human population density and livestock presence. The resulting habitat suitability surface showed strong predictive performance (AUC = 0.88; Boyce Index = 0.91) and correlated with known density estimates and distribution models. Jaguar Conservation Units (JCUs) and Protected Areas (PAs) contained 68.7% and 53.9% of predicted suitable habitat, respectively, while occupying only a third of the range. Non-designated lands, though comprising just 4% of the range, held nearly 10% of total suitability. The Amazon and Mayan Forests were identified as core strongholds, while ecoregion-based modelling revealed additional areas of high suitability in the Pantanal, Gran Chaco, Cerrado, and coastal Mexico. While Brazil encompassed the largest extent of highly suitable habitat, countries such as Paraguay, Argentina, and the United States gained conservation relevance under the ecoregion-stratified scenario.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemPantheraAnimalsBrazilHumansHabitat suitabilityIndigenous landsJaguar conservation unitsMultiscale modellingPanthera oncaProtected areas

Identifiers

PMID41444355
PMCPMC12780236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.