Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41444354›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Equity of total health expenditure in China, 2015-2021.

Minghua Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Minghua ZhouDepartment of Administration Office, Luzhou People's Hospital, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, China. minghuawind@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To analyze the equity of total health expenditure in China from 2015 to 2021 and to provide a scientific basis for promoting the healthy development of total health expenditure in China. Total health expenditure was divided into three components: government health expenditure, social health expenditure, and out-of-pocket health payments. Data from 2015 to 2021 were extracted, and the concentration index and Kakwani index were used to evaluate the equity. Mainland China (excluding Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan) was divided into the northeast, east, central, and west regions, and the health resource density index (HRDI) of the China average was used as the reference standard to calculate the deficiency and deficiency ratio in each region. The stepwise regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors of per capita total health expenditure in China. The average percentages of government health expenditure, social health expenditure, and out-of-pocket health payments were 28.26%, 43.94%, and 27.79%, respectively, from 2015 to 2021. The concentration indices of total health expenditure, government health expenditure, social health expenditure, and out-of-pocket health payments were all greater than 0. The Kakwani index of total health expenditure, government health expenditure, and out-of-pocket health payments was less than 0, while the Kakwani index of social health expenditure was greater than 0 overall but became less than 0 in 2021. Both GDP and total health expenditure in the northeast region moved toward lower percentages, and GDP and total health expenditure in the east region moved toward higher percentages. Taking the HRDI of China's average as the reference standard, the HRDI for total health expenditure, government health expenditure, social health expenditure, and out-of-pocket health payments in the east and central regions were higher than the reference standard, and the health expenditure in the east was more than 50% of the reference standard and the central region was more than 4% of the reference standard. The HRDI of total health expenditure, government health expenditure, social health expenditure, and out-of-pocket health payments in the west region was less than the reference standard, and the deficiency ratio of health expenditure in the west region was more than 46%. The HRDI of out-of-pocket health payments in the northeast region was higher than the reference standard from 2015 to 2020, and the HRDI of total health expenditure, government health expenditure, and social health expenditure in the northeast region was lower than the reference standard. Per capita disposable income and the number of health technicians per 1,000 population were the main factors influencing per capita total health expenditure in China from 2015 to 2021. The health financing structure was inappropriate, with a low percentage of government health expenditure and a high percentage of out-of-pocket health payments. Total health expenditure, government health expenditure, social health expenditure, and out-of-pocket health payments, all of the health expenditure tended to regions with higher levels of economic development. Total health expenditure, government health expenditure, and out-of-pocket health payments were regressive, and social health expenditure was progressive overall. Health expenditure was more adequate in the east and central regions and more inadequate in the west region. Per capita disposable income and the number of health technicians per 1,000 population had a greater impact on per capita total health expenditure in China.

Indexed as

Health ExpendituresChinaFinancing, PersonalHumansChinaConcentration indexHealth resource density indexKakwani indexTotal health expenditure

Identifiers

PMID41444354
PMCPMC12739109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.