ArticleScientific reports2025
Transcriptional responses in feeder time-trained foragers suggest diverse interactions between the circadian clock and mushroom bodies in honey bees.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reconsidering mammalian circadian organization.Neurobiology of sleep and circadian rhythms · 2026Article
- Comparative Transcriptomic and ceRNA Network Analyses of Non-Coding and Coding RNAs in Heads ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A hundred years ago Karl von Frisch and his students demonstrated that honey bees use time-memory to schedule their daily foraging flights. However, till today little is known about molecular processes and functional interactions between memory centers and the circadian clock underlying the capability to form time-memories in animals. Combining feeder time-training of foragers with time-series RNA sequencing and RNAscope labeling revealed molecular features associated with the expectation of foraging activity: (i) anticipatory activation of the transcription factor Egr1 and the receptor for pigment dispersing factor (pdfr) in the small-type Kenyon cells (KCs), (ii) synchronized peak-expression of more than 850 genes including Egr1 downstream genes and well-known memory-related genes during training time, and (iii) groups of KCs and cells associated with the central complex co-expressing per and cry2. With respect to earlier studies characterizing behavioral correlates of time-memory, we speculate that anticipatory initiation of physiological and transcriptional activity in the small-type KCs might function in preparing the worker bee for its foraging activity including reactivation and reconsolidation of foraging related memories. The expression of clock genes in addition to pdfr in KCs suggests an unexpected complexity of functional interactions between memory centers and the clock in honey bees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.