ArticleScientific reports2025
Assessing the generation and dispersal of respiratory particles using upper respiratory commensal bacteria as index organisms for respiratory pathogens.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a need to better understand the dispersal and spread of respiratory pathogens. However, carrying out controlled microbiology-based simulation studies is difficult, particularly if the target organism is highly pathogenic or is currently unknown. An alternative approach is to use commensal upper respiratory tract (URT) bacteria as index organisms. Healthy volunteers were asked to perform defined respiratory activities within a purpose-built flexible-film isolator. The dispersal of large (L-RPs) and small respiratory particles (S-RPs) was assessed via passive (settle plates) and active air sampling, respectively. Activities were carried out with or without a face covering. Dispersal of respiratory particles differed with individual. During speech, increased vocal volume was associated with a significant increase in the number of URT bacteria deposited as L-RPs and captured by air samplers (S-RPs). Disposable (IIR) medical face masks significantly reduced deposition of L-RPs and reduced the odds of recovering higher numbers of S-RPs by 87% (CI: 63%, 96%). Transparent face coverings were as effective as (IIR) face masks, but face shields had limited efficacy, particularly when worn by individuals who dispersed high numbers of RPs. Commensal URT bacteria can be used to study the risk of respiratory transmission in the absence of the target pathogen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.