ArticleScientific reports2025
A CRISPR-assisted passive microfluidic chip for rapid, visual detection of multiple respiratory viruses.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microfluidic and Paper-Based Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Systems for Decentralized Diagnostics and Biosurveillance.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Emerging Multimodal Point-of-Care Diagnostic Strategies for Rapid Detection and Management of Respiratory Viruses: A State-of-the-Art Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Rapid On-Site Detection ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- CRISPR Diagnostics, in Your Pocket.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, viral co-infections, particularly with respiratory viruses, have resulted in more complex symptoms, a greater disease burden, and increased challenges in clinical decision-making. These complexities underscore the urgent need for improved diagnostic tools in the managing acute respiratory infections. To address the limitations of conventional qPCR and current POCT methodologies, we developed a passively driven microfluidic chip capable of rapidly screening multiple respiratory viruses. This platform is particularly suited for the point-of-care diagnosis of viral co-infections. Our device integrates nucleic acid amplification and CRISPR-based detection within a single, passively operated system. By utilizing a rapid, 10-minute sample preparation protocol and a 35-minute on-chip assay, this platform enables the multiplex detection of influenza A/B, human parainfluenza virus, and SARS-CoV-2. The total assay time from sample to answer is approximately 45 min, with equipment requirements minimized to a heating block. The assay demonstrated a detection sensitivity of about 10 copies/µL for viral RNA in dilution series experiments. The sensitivity of the assay was 98.44% (95% CI: 91.6%-99.96%), and the specificity was 100% (95% CI: 79.4%-100%). The system combines CRISPR-Cas12a-mediated sensing with reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) for highly specific nucleic acid detection. The chip design utilizes capillary action and gravity-driven flow for autonomous fluid control, while lyophilized reagent preloading ensures storage stability and minimizes user intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.