Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41444308›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Two-year outcomes of denosumab treatment for osteoporosis comparing the effects of calcium and vitamin D supplementation.

Young-Ho Cho, Seong-Eun Byun, Hwan-Hee Lee

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Young-Ho ChoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Seong-Eun ByunDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, 9 Yatap-ro, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 13496, Republic of Korea. sonofos@daum.net.
Hwan-Hee LeeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 64, Daeheung-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon, 34943, Republic of Korea. hwanhee337@naver.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calcium and vitamin D supplementation is commonly recommended in conjunction with osteoporosis treatment. However, some patients are unable to tolerate or take these supplements due to various factors. This study aims to assess the impact of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on bone mineral density (BMD) changes over a two-year period in patients treated with denosumab, comparing those who received supplements with those who did not. This retrospective study included 344 patients who had received at least four doses of denosumab. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received calcium and vitamin D supplementation and those who did not. BMD was measured annually at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck, and denosumab efficacy was assessed by calculating the percentage change in BMD from baseline. We also evaluated BMD changes according to patients' prior osteoporosis treatments and history of osteoporotic fractures. In addition, a subgroup analysis was conducted among treatment-naïve patients, comparing those who received denosumab alone with those who received denosumab combined with calcium and vitamin D supplementation. The study cohort consisted of 328 women, with a mean age of 70.50 ± 9.48 years. Statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding prior osteoporosis treatment (P = 0.004) and baseline lumbar spine BMD (P = 0.027). However, no significant differences were observed in BMD changes at the lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck after one and two years of denosumab treatment, regardless of calcium and vitamin D supplementation. The type of prior osteoporosis medication and the presence of low-energy fragility fractures did not significantly affect BMD changes at either time point. In treatment-naïve patients (n = 209), BMD gains did not differ significantly between those with and without supplementation. Notably, none of the patients reported experiencing adverse events such as injection site infections, myalgia, or symptomatic hypocalcemia. The two-year treatment with denosumab resulted in improvements in BMD that were independent of calcium and vitamin D supplementation. These findings suggest that denosumab may increase BMD regardless of supplementation, though further studies are warranted to confirm this relationship.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsCalciumDenosumabDietary SupplementsOsteoporosisVitamin DAgedBone DensityFemaleFemur NeckHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBone Density Conservation AgentsCalciumDenosumabVitamin DBone mineral densityCalciumDenosumabSupplementsVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID41444308
PMCPMC12738674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.