Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41444299›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

LandScan mosaic enables high-resolution gridded population estimates with explicit uncertainty.

Daniel S Adams, Andrew Zimmer, Joseph Tuccillo, Jessica Moehl, Robert Stewart, Sarah Walters, Budhendra Bhaduri, Peter Li, Marie Urban

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel S AdamsGeospatial Science and Human Security Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA. adamsds@ornl.gov.
Andrew ZimmerGeospatial Science and Human Security Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Joseph TuccilloGeospatial Science and Human Security Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Jessica MoehlGeospatial Science and Human Security Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Robert StewartGeospatial Science and Human Security Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Sarah WaltersGeospatial Science and Human Security Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Budhendra BhaduriGeospatial Science and Human Security Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Peter LiDepartment of Earth Sciences, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, TN, USA.
Marie UrbanGeospatial Science and Human Security Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gridded population datasets represent high-resolution distributions of human occupancy, enabling informed decision-making across a broad range of fields. These data products are valuable for assessing environmental risk, urban development, disaster preparedness and resource allocation-areas where accurate population estimates directly enhance policy effectiveness and optimize resource distribution. Despite the importance of gridded population datasets, traditional population modeling approaches often overlook inherent uncertainties in the estimation process. This limitation can create a false sense of certainty in population estimates, potentially leading to flawed decisions by those who rely on the data. To address this methodological gap, we introduce a probabilistic machine learning modeling framework, LandScan Mosaic, that explicitly incorporates uncertainty into the population modeling process. Our approach systematically quantifies uncertainty in three key modeling parameters of the LandScan HD gridded population dataset: building use types, floor counts, and occupancy rates. By employing Monte Carlo simulations, we propagate these uncertainties through the modeling process, yielding probability distributions of population counts in place of deterministic point estimates. We demonstrate the practical application of this framework in Iloilo City, Philippines, using structured decision-making techniques and our probabilistic estimates to identify and prioritize areas most affected by projected flooding, supporting targeted interventions that address both economic and social risks. In doing so, we propose a population-specific approach for incorporating confidence into structured decision making processes. Through a comparative analysis with conventional deterministic approaches and point estimate approaches, including LandScan HD and WorldPop, we evaluate how the incorporation of machine learning and uncertainty influences decision rankings. This research advances population distribution modeling by offering a robust, quantitative approach that explicitly accounts for uncertainty in the underlying data, along with guidance for how users can apply uncertainty in their decision-making.

Identifiers

PMID41444299
PMCPMC12738844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.