ArticleScientific reports2025
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation reduces error amplitude during force field learning in healthy adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation during short-term motor practice drives cortical plasticity without behavioural improvement.The Journal of physiology · 2026Trial
- Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation reduces total striatal GABA+ content, increases DLPFC Glu content, and facilitates early-phase motor learning.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Efficacy of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in treating patients with post-stroke motor disorders: a prospective study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has gained increasing attention as an expected new clinical application for motor disease due to its synergistic effect with post-stroke rehabilitation. On the other hand, there are still few reports regarding the effects of taVNS on motor learning in healthy subjects. In the present study, we investigated how taVNS affects a reaching movement task under a force field condition (i.e., force field learning). A total of 32 healthy, right-handed subjects were divided into a taVNS and a sham group. Subjects were asked to make reaching movements with their right arm while holding the handle of the manipulandum against a velocity-dependent curl force field. taVNS was applied for 3 s at the start of the reaching movement. The results demonstrated that taVNS reduced the maximum rightward displacement (i.e., error amplitude) during force field learning, and the final values were significantly smaller in taVNS groups than in sham groups. These results suggest that taVNS matched with task initiation has an online effect on force field learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.