Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41444296›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Harnessing hyperspectral imaging and machine learning techniques for accurate discrimination of peanut plants and weeds.

Adel Bakhshipour, Shahriar Ramezanpour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adel BakhshipourDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, 41996-13776, Iran. abakhshipour@guilan.ac.ir.
Shahriar RamezanpourDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, 41996-13776, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective weed detection for precise management remains a pertinent issue in modern agriculture. In this study, hyperspectral imaging (HSI) was combined with machine learning (ML) to differentiate between peanut plants and four common weeds found in peanut fields. Several spectral preprocessing methods-Moving Window Averaging (MWA), Median Filtering (MF), Gaussian Filtering (GF), and Savitzky-Golay smoothing (SGS)-were applied. Feature selection algorithms, including Correlation-based feature selection (CFS), Principal Components Analysis (PCA), and Wrapper Feature Selection (WFS), were then used to extract the most informative wavelengths. Among the various classifiers evaluated, the combination of MF preprocessing, WFS algorithm, and LDA classifier (MF-WFS-LDA) achieved the best performance, while the WFS method selected 12 optimal wavelengths from a total of 465. The accuracy, precision, recall, and RMSE values of this model in the training stage were 99.71%, 0.997, 0.997, and 0.054, respectively. These statistics were 96.67%, 0.967, 0.968, and 0.088, respectively, in the test stage. Furthermore, it successfully differentiated peanuts from each weed species using a minimal number of optimal wavelengths. These findings highlight the potential of integrating HSI with ML for precise weed detection in peanut cultivation. However, further validation under diverse environmental and field conditions is recommended.

Indexed as

ArachisHyperspectral ImagingMachine LearningPlant WeedsAlgorithmsPrincipal Component AnalysisLinear discriminant analysisPrecision agricultureSpectral signatureWeed detectionWrapper feature section

Identifiers

PMID41444296
PMCPMC12738690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.