ArticleScientific reports2025
Effects of bisphosphonates after denosumab discontinuation and treatment effect heterogeneity using causal machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Managing Rebound Bone Loss After Denosumab Discontinuation: Mechanisms, Risk Stratification, and Sequential Therapy.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Discontinuation of denosumab is associated with a rebound increase in osteoporotic fracture (OF) risk, and bisphosphonates (BPs) are commonly recommended as sequential therapy to mitigate this risk. However, their real-world effectiveness-and whether certain patients benefit more than others-remains unclear. To address this question, we employed a causal machine learning approach capable of estimating heterogeneous treatment effects. We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study using Korean health insurance claims data and applied the causal survival forest model to evaluate the effect of BPs on recurrent OFs and explore treatment effect heterogeneity. Patients were followed for up to one year after the index date to ascertain fracture outcomes. BPs significantly reduced the risk of recurrent OFs (fracture-free probability difference: 0.032; 95% CI 0.022-0.042). Treatment effects varied by age, prior BP use, diabetes without complications, peptic ulcer disease, steroid use, and type of treatment institution. The model incorporated doubly robust adjustment for treatment assignment and time-to-event outcomes, while correcting for censoring in survival time estimation, resulting in conservative but robust effect estimates. Sensitivity analyses using traditional statistical methods supported the findings. This study provides causally informed, real-world evidence for the effectiveness of BPs after denosumab discontinuation and highlights the potential of causal machine learning to support personalized fracture prevention by identifying patient subgroups most likely to benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.