ArticleScientific reports2025
Effects of low calcium bentonite on the strength development of recycled aggregate concrete.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The negative environmental impact of high cement use and aggregate extraction can be minimized by the use of greener materials and recycled aggregate (RA) instead of conventional materials. In this study, the effects of a low-calcium bentonite (LCB) binder on the strength development and workability of recycled aggregate concrete are investigated. RA is used as 0, 50, and 100% by volume replacement of natural aggregate concrete (NAC), whereas bentonite is used as 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20% by weight replacement of cement for each level of RA. LCB addition significantly improved the 90-day compressive, flexural, and splitting tensile strengths of normal and RA concrete, whereas at 28 days, the results of the LCB mixtures were comparable to those of the control. The RA mixtures had slightly reduced compressive strengths, similar tensile strengths, and superior flexural strengths to those of NAC after 90 days. Higher correlations between all strength results with successively higher RAs. These results can be attributed to the pozzolanic properties of LCB and their symbiotic relationship with the mortar adhered to the surface of the RA, along with greater bonding surface regions for the cement matrix. The response surface methodology (RSM) confirmed the trend in strength.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.