Trial reportScientific reports2025
A randomized controlled trial investigating digital resilience training for healthcare professionals.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05130879 (Evaluation of Building Resilience at Work), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of Building Resilience at Work (BRAW) Training Among Healthcare Workers: A Sequential Mixed Methods Design
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The unpredictable coronavirus disease and complexity of healthcare settings have caused emotional exhaustion and burnout among healthcare professionals globally. Building resilience at work training can facilitate a change in healthcare professionals' overall ability to bounce back from adversity. The study aimed to develop, validate, and evaluate a digital resilience training (BRAW) for healthcare professionals in Singapore. Considering the multifactorial nature of resilience at work, the content of the 6-session resilience training was developed based on systematic reviews and psychological theories. The overall rating was 85% of the total points across five experts using the Conduct and Health-Related Website Evaluation Form, indicating valid content. A two-armed randomized controlled trial was used among 410 healthcare professionals. Primary outcome was resilience, and secondary outcomes included work engagement, intention to leave, and counterproductive work behavior. Three study time points were assessed. A generalized estimating equations model showed that the healthcare professionals in the BRAW had significant improvement in resilience, at the post-intervention and/or 3-month follow-up. Findings suggested that BRAW can be considered as supplementary training for healthcare professionals to equip themselves for handling unpredictable pandemics in the future. Further research is needed to examine the long-term effects and generalizability of digital resilience training.Clinical trial numbers: (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05130879, first registration date: 23/11/2021).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.