Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41444268›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A predictive model for vertical ground reaction force during incline push-ups.

Huimin Wu, Haiting Zhai, Rui Ma, Hongwen Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Huimin Wu *Beijing Sport University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Haiting Zhai *Beijing Sport University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Rui MaXi'an Physical Education University, Xi an, 710000, China.
Hongwen WeiBeijing Sport University, Beijing, 100084, China. weihw@bsu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Push-ups enhance upper body strength without special equipment, yet the impact of different inclinations on intensity is not well-understood. Although the load-velocity relationship is established in resistance training, its relevance to push-ups needs further exploration. Previous studies have suggested that inclination affects muscle activation, but accurate models for predicting exercise intensity remain underdeveloped. To address this gap, this study aims to develop a reliable predictive model based on ground reaction forces measured during push-ups performed at different inclinations and speeds. Twenty-seven male university students participated, performing push-ups at 10°, 20°, and 30° inclinations with feet elevated, at three metronome-enforced tempos (7 reps/10 s, 5/10 s, and 4/10 s). Body measurements, vertical ground reaction forces, and average speeds were recorded for each angle. This study developed a predictive model for vertical ground reaction force during push-up exercises that incorporates body mass, incline angle, and movement tempo. Force data were collected with a Kistler force platform (Model 9281EA, Switzerland) and modeled via multiple linear regression. Agreement between predicted and measured forces was summarized using Bland-Altman analyses: mean biases were small (|bias| ≤ 16.66 N) and the 95% limits of agreement were approximately ± 104-206 N across conditions. Significant angle-specific associations were observed between tempo and force. At 10°, maximum force correlated with fast (r = 0.58, p = 0.005) and medium tempos (r = 0.69, p < 0.001). At 20°, all tempos correlated with maximum force, most strongly at slow tempo (r = 0.74, p < 0.001), and minimum force correlated with medium (r = 0.61, p < 0.001) and slow tempos (r = 0.75, p < 0.001). At 30°, both fast (r = 0.55, p = 0.009) and slow tempos (r = 0.54, p = 0.010) were associated with maximum force. These findings support the use of the model to inform individualized load prescription across common incline angles and tempos. Within the tested conditions (10°, 20°, 30° and three tempos), the regression model showed moderate predictive performance with acceptable agreement between predicted and measured forces. The 20° models for minimum force performed best at medium and slow tempos. Because body mass was a positive predictor of force across angles, individual body mass should be considered when prescribing push-up intensity.

Indexed as

ExerciseMuscle StrengthResistance TrainingAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalYoung AdultInclination angleLoad-velocityPush-upsVelocity-based training

Identifiers

PMID41444268
PMCPMC12738558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.