ArticleNature communications2025
Stable de novo protein design via joint conformational landscape and sequence optimization.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generative AI for controllable protein sequence design: A survey.npj drug discovery · 2026Review
- ProtSeqGen: a novel deep learning model for protein sequence design.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Accurate protein stability prediction for small domains using mega-scale experiments.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Generative protein modeling provides advanced tools for designing diverse protein sequences and structures. However, accurately modeling the conformational landscape and designing sequences remain critical challenges: ensuring that the designed sequence reliably folds into the target structure as its most stable conformation, and optimizing the sequence for a given suboptimal fixed input structure. In this study, we present a systematic analysis of jointly optimizing sequence-to-structure and structure-to-sequence mappings. This approach enables us to find optimal solutions for modeling the conformational landscape. We validate our approach with large-scale protein stability measurements, demonstrating that joint optimization is superior for designing stable proteins using a joint model (TrRosetta and TrMRF) and for achieving high accuracy in stability prediction when jointly modeling (half-masked ESMFold pLDDT + ESM2 Pseudo-likelihood). We further investigate features of sequences generated from the joint model and find that they exhibit higher frequencies of hydrophilic interactions, which may help maintain both secondary structure registry and pairing-features not captured by structure-to-sequence modeling alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.