Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41444019›Full record

Trial reportWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health

Patient Characteristics Associated With Group Prenatal Care Attendance in a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Emily A Doherty, Sarah Griffin, Kathleen B Cartmell, Moonseong Heo, Liwei Chen, Jessica L Britt, Amy H Crockett

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily A DohertyDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina.
Sarah GriffinDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina.
Kathleen B CartmellDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina.
Moonseong HeoDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina. Electronic address: mheo@clemson.edu.
Liwei ChenDepartment of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Jessica L BrittDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prisma Health, Greenville, South Carolina.
Amy H CrockettDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prisma Health, Greenville, South Carolina.

Funding

Reducing disparities in birth outcomes: a randomized controlled trial on CenteringPregnancyR01HD082311 · NICHD · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI CROCKETT, AMY HAIRSTON, HEO, MOONSEONG · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD082311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGroup prenatal care (GPNC) represents a promising alternative to individual prenatal care (IPNC) for better perinatal outcomes. Some studies suggest better perinatal outcomes with more GPNC sessions attended. The present study sought to examine patient characteristics associated with higher or lower GPNC session attendance.

methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of data collected in a single-site randomized controlled trial comparing GPNC to IPNC, focusing solely on patients assigned to GPNC. The outcome of interest was GPNC session attendance. Predictors evaluated included patient sociodemographic, psychosocial, health, and health behavior characteristics. The association of patient characteristics with session attendance was assessed using Zero-Inflated Poisson regression.

resultsThe sample (n = 1,068) was racially diverse (40.7% Black, 35.8% white, 22.1% Hispanic) and largely Medicaid eligible (92.3%). The characteristics of older age (adjusted relative risk [aRR] = 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.00, 1.01]; p = .012), foreign nativity (aRR = 1.14; 95% CI [1.06, 1.22]; p < .001), and prenatal distress (aRR = 1.09; 95% CI [1.01, 1.19]; p = .030) were associated with higher session attendance. Being in a committed relationship but unmarried (aRR = .91; 95% CI [.85, .97]; p = .007), less than high school education (aRR = .89; 95% CI [.82, .97]; p = .007), depressive symptoms (aRR = .93; 95% CI [.87, .99]; p = .027), housing instability (aRR = .92; 95% CI [.84, .99]; p = .049), housing issues (aRR = .88; 95% CI [.80, .97]; p = .008), life stressors (aRR = .92; 95% CI [.86, .98]; p = .010), gestational diabetes (aRR = .81; 95% CI [.71, .91]; p < .001), and smoking (aRR = .92; 95% CI [.85, .99]; p = .040) were associated with lower session attendance. DISCUSSION: Patient characteristics were differentially associated with GPNC session attendance. Given that patients with less education, more depressive symptoms, housing instability, stressors, gestational diabetes, and prenatal cigarette use attended fewer sessions, adaptations to the GPNC model to reduce attendance barriers for these groups should be considered.

Indexed as

Group ProcessesPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrenatal CareAdultFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansPregnancySocioeconomic FactorsUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41444019
PMCPMC12987632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.