ReviewEpilepsia2026
A call for ethical, equitable, and effective artificial intelligence to improve care for all people with epilepsy: A roadmap. A report by the ILAE Global Advocacy Council and Big Data Commission.
Review in Epilepsia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Improving the Management of People With Epilepsy in Low-and-Middle Income Countries.European journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for pediatric neuroimaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Review
- Neuropsychological Mechanisms Associated with the Effectiveness of AI-Delivered Health Promotion Programs: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Is It Policy And Not Treatment That Actually Determines Epilepsy Outcomes?Epilepsy currents · 2026Article
- From promise to practice: Navigating the challenges of AI integration in clinical neurophysiology.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The artificial intelligence (AI) revolution is upon us. It will inevitably form a central component of epilepsy workflows and patient advocacy. Therefore, it behooves us as health care providers to ride the crest of this wave and guide its direction for the benefit of all people with epilepsy. Emerging AI-based solutions include decision support tools, automated interpretation of electroencephalography (EEG) and brain imaging, and wearable devices that detect seizures and improve patient safety. Pipelines, including decentralized approaches and federated learning, are now being built that will democratize access and facilitate the next generation of AI tools for the global epilepsy community. Despite this, enduring issues remain incompletely addressed. For example, AI requires high volumes of data, leading to concerns about ethical ownership, stewardship, and privacy. Few AI-based tools have progressed from derivation to validation stages, and only rare exceptions undergo real-world evaluation. Inadvertent harmful algorithmic and decision allocation biases also continue to represent major risks to the global epilepsy population. Additional barriers include geographical disparities in computing resources, proprietary ownership of electronic health records, EEG, and brain-imaging platforms, and greenhouse gas emissions related to the demanding power requirements of AI. Therefore, to fully avail ourselves of the benefits of AI, we assert that ethical, equitable, and effective AI for epilepsy requires collaboration from the entirety of the global epilepsy community. Fundamental to this is early and deliberate engagement of people from low- and middle-income countries to ensure that AI-based solutions do not exacerbate existing global disparities. Ultimately, we advocate for "decision intelligence" approaches to the development of AI-based epilepsy solutions, which involves early engagement of all interest-holders to ensure that the correct questions are addressed and the right technical approaches are deployed to maximize value for the global epilepsy community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.