ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2026
Ensembles and engrams in mouse cortical and sub-thalamic brain regions supporting context and memory recall.
Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Associative learning supports learning about outcomes associated with contexts and cues. During learning, cellular ensembles that become active can be incorporated into memory engrams and later reactivated to support recall. Studies exploring engram formation and reactivation have primarily used contextual conditioning in mice and made little distinction between ensembles supporting contextual information versus cue-associated learning and recall. Furthermore, often missing in such analyses is exploration of sex differences in ensemble dynamics. Using auditory fear conditioning and activity-dependent tagging in mice, we set out to disaggregate context-associated ensembles from those associated with cue-related learning and recall while also profiling potential sex differences. Specifically, we quantified cellular activity during context exposure, fear recall, extinction training, and extinction recall in cortical and subthalamic brain regions supporting learning and memory. We found that male mice had denser ensembles of cells active in the infralimbic prefrontal cortex (IL-PFC) during context exposure, while female mice had a significantly greater proportion of newly active cells in the IL-PFC during fear recall. We also found a sexually dimorphic pattern of correlation between activity in the IL-PFC and in the zona incerta (ZI). Across sexes, we found denser overlapping cells and greater reactivation of extinction ensembles in the IL-PFC. These results emphasize that there is a distinction to be made between ensembles supporting contextual information from those encoding cue-associated memory and highlight important sex differences in ensemble dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.