ArticleJournal of vascular surgery2026
Suicidal ideation among vascular surgery trainees.
Article in Journal of vascular surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSuicidal ideation (SI) during surgical training is poorly understood and may be attributed to a variety of personal and environmental risk factors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of SI among vascular surgery trainees.
methodsData were collected from a confidential, voluntary survey administered after the 2020-2024 Vascular Surgery In-Training Exam as part of the SECOND trial (Surgical Education Culture Optimization through targeted interventions based on National comparative Data Trial). SI was assessed with the following question: "In the past 12 months, have you had thoughts of taking your own life?" Positive screens prompted presentation of the National Suicide Hotline. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate demographic and learning environmental factors associated with suicidality.
resultsA total of 3272 survey results were collected from 2020 to 2024. Seventy-four respondents (2.3%) reported positive SI. In considering the most recent year of responses (2024), demographic variables were comparable between trainees who did and did not screen positive for SI. However, trainees who screened positive were more likely to report negative learning environment factors, including pressure to under-report hours (31% vs 6%), lack of a sense of belonging among trainees (15% vs 4%), sexual harassment (46% vs 10%), and perception of program unresponsiveness (38% vs 5%), among other factors.
conclusionsAlthough low rates of SI limit more detailed statistical analysis, this remains the most comprehensive evaluation among vascular surgery trainees. Although rates remain low, they are associated with burnout. Modifiable learning environmental factors, such as harassment, program responsiveness, and trainee camaraderie, may be potential areas for intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.