Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41442761›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2025

An index of intergenerational justice: main concepts and preliminary evidence from the Age-It Research Program.

Vincenzo Galasso, Anna Elisabetta Galeotti, Asya Bellia, Enrico Biale, Carlo Burelli, Davide Pala, Cristobal Ruiz-Tagle Coloma, Laura Santi Amantini, Gloria Zuccarelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Aging well in an aging society: Italy at the forefront of global aging and the Age-It Research Program.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Aging in aging societies: the transformation of life courses and how we study them.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vincenzo GalassoDepartment of Social and Political Sciences, Università Bocconi, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3882-0587
Anna Elisabetta GaleottiDepartment of Humanities, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Vercelli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6142-5622
Asya BelliaDepartment of Social and Political Sciences, Università Bocconi, Milan, Italy.
Enrico BialeDepartment of Humanities, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Vercelli, Italy.
Carlo BurelliDepartment of Humanities, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Vercelli, Italy.
Davide PalaDepartment of Humanities, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Vercelli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0785-3340
Cristobal Ruiz-Tagle ColomaDepartment of Economics, Universidad Finis Terrae, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0009-0008-2384-6611
Laura Santi AmantiniDepartment of Humanities, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Vercelli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5604-9389
Gloria ZuccarelliDepartment of Humanities, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Vercelli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2375-2593

Funding

PNRR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAging reshapes the balance between younger and older generations within the population. These demographic shifts have significant implications for economic and environmental resource allocations and the transformation of social and political status and individual rights. To explore these dynamics, we present findings from Spoke 7 (Cultural and Political Dimensions of Ageing Societies) of the Age-It Research Program, which has developed a novel Index of Intergenerational Justice.

methodsThe Index of Intergenerational Justice, applied to a broad sample of European countries, captures three key dimensions of justice: distributive fairness, social (status and relational) equality, and political equality. We focus on differences across age groups, rather than across cohorts, due to well-documented challenges in direct cohort comparisons. The distributive fairness dimension covers economics (relative poverty, unemployment, permanent contracts, wages), health (unmet medical needs), and the environment (environmental risk exposure). The social equality dimension captures social isolation (measured through leisure activities, internet access, social contacts, and close relationships), discrimination, and mental well-being. Finally, the political equality dimension considers political perceptions, political engagement, and political representation.

resultsPreliminary findings reveal substantial differences across age groups in the distributive fairness dimension. A cluster of countries appears to favor older adults, while another favors younger adults. By contrast, in the social equality dimension, nearly all countries tend to favor young adults. DISCUSSION: The Intergenerational Justice Index provides a valuable tool for assessing fairness across age groups. By highlighting disparities, it can inform and support public policies aimed at fostering more equitable relationships between generations.

Indexed as

AgingIntergenerational RelationsSocial JusticeAdultAgedEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPoliticsFairnessIsolationRedistribution

Identifiers

PMID41442761
PMCPMC12736992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.