ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2025
Education and learning for active aging: promising practices and findings from the Age-It Research Program.
Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aging well in an aging society: Italy at the forefront of global aging and the Age-It Research Program.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025Article
- Positive demography: changing the perspective on population aging from the Age-It Research Program.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025Article
- Participatory approach, dissemination, and implementation of research on aging: the Age-It experience.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study maps "promising practices" across a range of organizations that support older adults' participation and learning to develop an evidence base for relevant policies and programs. It presents findings from the Learning, Education, and Active Aging Board of the Age-It Research Program.
methodsThis mixed-methods study, following a sequential explanatory design, gathered quantitative data via a questionnaire, completed by public and private organizations active in offering programs/activities to older adults. The questionnaire collected information about the organization profile, the target population, and the educational activity. For qualitative data, semi-structured interviews were conducted with staff coordinators and managers.
resultsForty-three organizations, mostly Italian non-governmental organizations (NGOs), reported on 50 "promising practices" with a wide range of aims, consistent with the definition of lifelong and lifewide learning: social inclusion, health promotion, caregivers support, social work and volunteering, digital literacy, and intergenerational activities. Lack of coordination, low exchange between organizations, funding, and sustainability were the main weaknesses. From the analysis of qualitative data, three main topics emerged: prevention of frailty, empowerment through innovation, and participation. DISCUSSION: This exploratory study outlines the richness of the mapped activities, as well as limited exchange and collaboration among the involved actors, the absence of a shared framework to assess the quality of practices addressed to older adults' learning and participation, and the need for research and evaluation. Furthermore, national policies for active and healthy aging should allocate specific resources for learning and education to support older adults in terms of skills, social participation, meaning, and recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.