ArticleJMIR human factors2025
Experiences of Using Online Peer Forums Among People With Postpartum Psychosis: Interpretative Phenomenological Study.
Article in JMIR human factors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough research has found online peer support forums to be helpful for those with mental health conditions, no studies have explored the experiences of those who use forums for support with postpartum psychosis (PP) specifically.
objectiveThis study aimed to understand the lived experiences of using online forums for PP, and how this form of support differs from professional and other informal support.
methodsThis study used a qualitative approach, including semistructured interviews with 8 participants. Recruitment took place via an online forum run by a charity called Action on Postpartum Psychosis. Transcripts were analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis.
resultsFour themes were developed in line with participants' experiences (1) from isolation to connection: validation, growth, and hope from shared experiences; (2) complementing not replacing: filling the gaps in support; (3) impacts of privacy, representation, and readiness to share on engagement; and (4) relational experiences within peer support: altruism, boundaries, and comparison. All participants believed forums were helpful to their well-being and recovery; however, some also reported difficulties with engagement, comparison, and regulating their own use. Findings suggest that forums may benefit from being designed in a way that protects users and their identities, for example, via trigger warnings and setting boundaries.
conclusionsPeer online forums offer a unique and potentially effective addition to existing support provided by professionals and personal connections. Professionals should signpost people experiencing PP to forums, but should also understand the support that may be needed in terms of monitoring use and ensuring that appropriate boundaries are put into place.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.