Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41442555›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026

Bayesian networks and structural equation models reveal genetic causal relationships between productivity, defense, and climate-adaptability traits in interior lodgepole pine.

Eduardo P Cappa, Jennifer G Klutsch, Andy Benowicz, Sebastián Munilla, Shawn D Mansfield, Nadir Erbilgin, Barb R Thomas, Yousry A El-Kassaby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eduardo P CappaInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Instituto de Recursos Biológicos, Centro de Investigación en Recursos Naturales, De Los Reseros y Dr. Nicolás Repetto s/n, Hurlingham, Buenos Aires 1686, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-6234-2263
Jennifer G KlutschNatural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, Alberta T6H 3S5, Canada.
Andy BenowiczForest Stewardship and Trade Branch, Alberta Forestry and Parks, Edmonton, Alberta T6H 5T6, Canada.
Sebastián MunillaDepartamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires 1417, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-2666-2566
Shawn D MansfieldDepartment of Wood Science, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Nadir ErbilginDepartment of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, 442 Earth Sciences Bldg., Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9912-8095
Barb R ThomasDepartment of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, 442 Earth Sciences Bldg., Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3, Canada.
Yousry A El-KassabyDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4887-8977

Funding

Alberta Innovates - BioSolutions 16R75221Alberta Innovates - BioSolutions RES0028979Alberta Innovates - BioSolutions RES0035327Forest Resource Improvement Association of Alberta RES0036845Forest Resource Improvement Association of Alberta RES0037021Genome Alberta 16R10106Genome Alberta RES0034657Genome Alberta RES0034664Genome BC 16R75421Genome BC 16R75546Genome Canada 16R75036Genome Canada RES0031330Genome Canada RES0034654University of Alberta/Faculty ALES/Dept RR RES0034569
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the integration of Bayesian networks (BN) and structural equation models (SEM) to explore genomic relationships among nine traits related to productivity, defense, and climate-adaptability in an interior lodgepole pine breeding program. Data from 392 open-pollinated trees, genotyped with 25,099 SNP markers, were analyzed. The traditional multitrait model (MTM) served as a benchmark for comparing SEM in estimating genetic (co)variance components, genetic correlations, breeding value (BV) predictions, and predictive ability, using both pedigree- (ABLUP) and genomic-based (GBLUP) individual-tree mixed models. The Hill-Climbing algorithm identified 12 significant causal structures (λ) among traits. Strong positive causal effects included tree height (HT) on wood density (WD) (λHT→WD = 0.413) and on stable carbon isotope ratio (C13) (λHT→C13 = 0.565), and limonene (LIMO) on carbon assimilation rate (CAR) (λLIMO→CAR = 0.368). The most influential causal relationship was HT → C13, followed by resistance to western gall rust (WGR) → CAR, CAR → LIMO, and WGR → C13. SEM incorporated these relationships, capturing both direct and indirect effects. Compared with MTM, SEM yielded lower residual variances, higher additive variances, and higher heritability estimates for all traits. The λ values from SEM correlated strongly with genetic correlations (0.932), with similarly high correlations between models (0.929), though SEM produced lower posterior mean correlations. BV correlations between models were high (ABLUP > 0.82, GBLUP > 0.84), but some reranking occurred among the top 39 trees (ABLUP > 0.71, GBLUP > 0.42). ABLUP and GBLUP-SEM models outperformed MTM in predictive ability, with mean gains of 6.62 and 6.03%, mainly for conditioned traits. BN-SEM enhances understanding of trait networks, improving genomic evaluations and breeding strategies in forest trees.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalClimateModels, GeneticPinusQuantitative Trait, HeritableBayes TheoremGenotypePhenotypePlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociBayesian networksgenetic causal effectsgenetic parameterslodgepole pinemultiple-trait analysisstructural equation model

Identifiers

PMID41442555
PMCPMC12958823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.