ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025
Recombination Suppression Drives Expansion of the Drosophila Dot Chromosome.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic and evolutionary basis of parthenogenesis in a disease-vector tick species.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome size varies widely, even among closely related species, yet much less is known about chromosome size variation. Here we use the fourth chromosome of Drosophila, also known as the "Muller F element" or "dot chromosome", as a model to investigate chromosome-specific size expansion. The F element of most Drosophila species is small (∼1.3 Mb) and almost entirely heterochromatic, yet harbors approximately 80 protein-coding genes. Here, we study D. kikkawai, D. takahashii, D. ananassae, and D. bipectinata, whose F elements are 2- to 15-fold larger in size compared to D. melanogaster. Through manual gene curation and comparative genomic analysis, we find that their F elements have expanded primarily via accumulation of transposable elements (TEs) in introns and intergenic regions. Natural selection appears less efficient on these expanded F elements: they have smaller effective population sizes and their genes exhibit reduced usage of optimal codons, compared to D. melanogaster. We propose that F element size variation is driven by differences in F element recombination rates. The ultra-long (∼20 Mb) F elements of D. ananassae and D. bipectinata display high rates of rearrangement and sequence evolution and exhibit independent TE-driven expansions. Our results suggest that F elements of most Drosophila species likely recombine enough to prevent size expansion, while F element recombination in D. ananassae and D. bipectinata is either absent or rare enough to allow TEs and other deleterious mutations to accumulate via Muller's ratchet; thus, these chromosomes evolve more like a Y chromosome than a typical Drosophila F element.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.