Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41442496›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025

Recombination Suppression Drives Expansion of the Drosophila Dot Chromosome.

Timothy J Stanek, Wilson Leung, Christopher D Shaffer, Genomics Education Partnership, Ishtar Olaveja, Annabelle Laughlin, Jaquelyn Hester, Darwin Garrido, Emily K Oh, Maria Volski and 22 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

Timothy J StanekDepartment of Genetics, Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9192-4978
Wilson LeungDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1371-1915
Christopher D ShafferDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7676-4347
Genomics Education Partnership
Ishtar OlavejaDepartment of Biology, New Jersey City University, Jersey City, NJ, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-8359-3920
Annabelle LaughlinDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-6978-1263
Jaquelyn HesterDepartment of Genetics, Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-3567-4854
Darwin GarridoDepartment of Biology, New Jersey City University, Jersey City, NJ, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-6713-6097
Emily K OhDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-6317-4473
Maria VolskiDepartment of Genetics, Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9619-5946
Nistha PandaDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5214-4474
Mia MoDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-8995-5028
Ethan CordesDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-3039-1523
Martin DallingDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-7148-8709
Kacie KershawDepartment of Biology, New Jersey City University, Jersey City, NJ, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-7128-8325
Malcolm ArnottDepartment of Biology, New Jersey City University, Jersey City, NJ, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-9230-6597
Stephen DalyDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-8185-3142
Silvia Garcia ValenzuelaDepartment of Biology, New Jersey City University, Jersey City, NJ, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-2289-8106
Paige ThompsonDepartment of Genetics, Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-7038-9176
Kayla L HastertDepartment of Biology, New Jersey City University, Jersey City, NJ, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-1071-5184
Destiny SabbDepartment of Biology, New Jersey City University, Jersey City, NJ, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-2239-7444
Kathryn KarpinskiDepartment of Biology, New Jersey City University, Jersey City, NJ, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-1408-3006
Meher Naaz AroraDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-0553-9586
Nicholas RiusDepartment of Biology, New Jersey City University, Jersey City, NJ, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-3481-8724
Larissa LoBelloDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1238-5019
Sebastian JaramilloDepartment of Biology, New Jersey City University, Jersey City, NJ, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-8662-4288
Omkar SonavaneDepartment of Genetics, Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-1632-9069
Alice HerrmannDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-3600-3787
Laura K ReedDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4381-494X
Sarah C R ElginDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5176-2510
Cindy ArrigoDepartment of Biology, New Jersey City University, Jersey City, NJ, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-4741-642X
Christopher E EllisonDepartment of Genetics, Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0350-0962

Funding

IRACDA at Rutgers: INSPIRE Postdoctoral Training ProgramK12GM093854 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI Detlev Boison, Gary A. Brewer · 2010 to 2026
$14.7M
Expanding the Genomics Education Partnership: Regional Mentoring and Training Networks to Diversify Bioinformatics Education and ResearchR25GM130517 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN TUSCALOOSA · PI CHALKER, DOUGLAS LEE, REED, LAURA K · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
Genetic Specification and Evolution of 3D Genome OrganizationR01GM130698 · NIGMS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI ELLISON, CHRISTOPHER EUGENE · 2018 to 2022
$1.6M
Mechanisms and evolutionary consequences of transposon strategies to counteract host silencingR01GM140163 · NIGMS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI ELLISON, CHRISTOPHER EUGENE · 2021 to 2024
$1.5M
Transposon strategies to escape host silencingR35GM152168 · NIGMS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI Christopher Eugene Ellison · 2024 to 2026
$1.4M
National Science Foundation 1915544National Science Foundation 2114661NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM093854NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM130698NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM140163NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM130517NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM152168NIH HHS K12GM093854NIH HHS R01GM130698NIH HHS R25GM130517NIH HHS R35GM152168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome size varies widely, even among closely related species, yet much less is known about chromosome size variation. Here we use the fourth chromosome of Drosophila, also known as the "Muller F element" or "dot chromosome", as a model to investigate chromosome-specific size expansion. The F element of most Drosophila species is small (∼1.3 Mb) and almost entirely heterochromatic, yet harbors approximately 80 protein-coding genes. Here, we study D. kikkawai, D. takahashii, D. ananassae, and D. bipectinata, whose F elements are 2- to 15-fold larger in size compared to D. melanogaster. Through manual gene curation and comparative genomic analysis, we find that their F elements have expanded primarily via accumulation of transposable elements (TEs) in introns and intergenic regions. Natural selection appears less efficient on these expanded F elements: they have smaller effective population sizes and their genes exhibit reduced usage of optimal codons, compared to D. melanogaster. We propose that F element size variation is driven by differences in F element recombination rates. The ultra-long (∼20 Mb) F elements of D. ananassae and D. bipectinata display high rates of rearrangement and sequence evolution and exhibit independent TE-driven expansions. Our results suggest that F elements of most Drosophila species likely recombine enough to prevent size expansion, while F element recombination in D. ananassae and D. bipectinata is either absent or rare enough to allow TEs and other deleterious mutations to accumulate via Muller's ratchet; thus, these chromosomes evolve more like a Y chromosome than a typical Drosophila F element.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, InsectDrosophilaRecombination, GeneticAnimalsDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophila melanogasterEvolution, MolecularGenome SizeSelection, GeneticDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophilagenome sizeheterochromatin

Identifiers

PMID41442496
PMCPMC12728734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.