Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41442454›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2026

Comparison of linear and threshold models for genetic evaluation of morphological defects in Nellore cattle.

Milena Aparecida Ferreira Campos, Hinayah Rojas De Oliveira, Henrique Alberto Mulim, Eduarda Da Silva Oliveira, Jorge Hidalgo, Raphael Bermal Costa

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Milena Aparecida Ferreira CamposSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, 40170-110, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2198-235X
Hinayah Rojas De OliveiraDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.
Henrique Alberto MulimDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.
Eduarda Da Silva OliveiraDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.
Jorge HidalgoDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.ORCID 0000-0002-0783-381X
Raphael Bermal CostaSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, 40170-110, Brazil.

Funding

São Paulo Research Foundation #2018/20026-8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Morphological defects in beef cattle can compromise animal welfare and productivity, yet they remain underexplored in genetic evaluations. In this study, we assessed the prevalence and estimated genetic parameters for seven morphological defects in Nellore cattle, including depigmentation, feet and legs malformation, chamfer deviations, loin and jaw defects, hump irregularities, and navel abnormalities, using linear and threshold models. Data from over 180,000 animals recorded between 1998 and 2021 were analyzed. Defect prevalence increased over time, likely due to improved phenotyping and broader participation in data collection. After appropriate scale conversion, linear and threshold models yielded similar heritability estimates; with heritability ranging from 0.03 to 0.12 across traits. Genomic estimated breeding values from both models were expressed on the probability scale, with Spearman correlations of probability scaled values ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 across models. Agreement among commonly selected sires was also high (Spearman 0.94 to 0.97), indicating consistent rankings across models. Feet and legs malformations showed moderate positive correlations with chamfer (0.50) and jaw defects (0.51); chamfer had moderate correlated with hump (0.52); and loin had low positive correlated with jaw (0.34) and with feet and legs (0.39). Depigmentation showed weak correlations with all other traits (<0.20), suggesting distinct genetic control. These results support including morphological defects in routine genetic evaluations and underscore the value of model-appropriate transformations to maintain ranking consistency and interpretability.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesAnimalsBreedingCattleFemaleLinear ModelsMaleModels, GeneticPhenotypebinary traitsbreeding valuesgenomic selectionheritabilityliability scalemodel comparison

Identifiers

PMID41442454
PMCPMC12863953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.