ArticleJournal of animal science2026
Comparison of linear and threshold models for genetic evaluation of morphological defects in Nellore cattle.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic and genomic insights into morphological defects in nellore cattle: a comprehensive review.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Review
- Scaling linear-model breeding values to the liability scale: an application to pig binary traits.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Genome-Wide Association Study of Morphological Defects in Nellore Cattle Using a Binary Trait Framework.Genes · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Morphological defects in beef cattle can compromise animal welfare and productivity, yet they remain underexplored in genetic evaluations. In this study, we assessed the prevalence and estimated genetic parameters for seven morphological defects in Nellore cattle, including depigmentation, feet and legs malformation, chamfer deviations, loin and jaw defects, hump irregularities, and navel abnormalities, using linear and threshold models. Data from over 180,000 animals recorded between 1998 and 2021 were analyzed. Defect prevalence increased over time, likely due to improved phenotyping and broader participation in data collection. After appropriate scale conversion, linear and threshold models yielded similar heritability estimates; with heritability ranging from 0.03 to 0.12 across traits. Genomic estimated breeding values from both models were expressed on the probability scale, with Spearman correlations of probability scaled values ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 across models. Agreement among commonly selected sires was also high (Spearman 0.94 to 0.97), indicating consistent rankings across models. Feet and legs malformations showed moderate positive correlations with chamfer (0.50) and jaw defects (0.51); chamfer had moderate correlated with hump (0.52); and loin had low positive correlated with jaw (0.34) and with feet and legs (0.39). Depigmentation showed weak correlations with all other traits (<0.20), suggesting distinct genetic control. These results support including morphological defects in routine genetic evaluations and underscore the value of model-appropriate transformations to maintain ranking consistency and interpretability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.